Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
rackmount tube preamps
- Thread starter Juniorkimbrough
- Start date
LoGruvz said:
OK, thanks. I knew that they had quit before but I thought they started them back up again.
Aw shucks.....
...WOW! Is that 100% true about the Kern? If so, damn...I wonder why?...
~S~
PS: Glad I still have mine...
~S~
PS: Glad I still have mine...
Unless they started making them again I was under the impression they stoped. It's a great pre.
I have an old Pearce B2p and BC1 that are killer - wish they still made those too.
I have an old Pearce B2p and BC1 that are killer - wish they still made those too.
another vote for the f1-x.
it's alot more flexible than many folks think...been playing mine out alot lately...seems the key is to ignore the seemingly extreme knob settings
and just use your ears.
.02
doug
it's alot more flexible than many folks think...been playing mine out alot lately...seems the key is to ignore the seemingly extreme knob settings
and just use your ears.
.02
doug
That's funny. Hey do you play Ashborys? I certainly do, frequently.ashbory said:Wouldn't it be easier to just list the two that you don't own
ashbory said:
It's been a week since I tested all of these, rotating them through the V1 socket. The LPS is both warm and defined. The Tung-sol I remember as being warm in the same way, stronger low end and not as defined... that said, it is all very subjective, and I would need to A/B them again to assure that's how I felt comparing these two.
tombowlus said:
... good question ... and I'm still searching for that answer myself. I like the vintage fretless J- bass sound, but with definition and with more overtones. My current favorite bass is my Dean Edge Fretless 4 with Nordstrand pups and Aguilar OBP-2 preamp ... into DB659 (with LPS in V1 and Groove tubes Chinese 12zx7 in V2) into a TFB-550 set flat except for the Timbre set at -7 dB. I like this tone.
- Apr 3, 2003
- 35,515
- 19,942
- Disclosures
- Editor-in-Chief, Bass Gear Magazine
westland said:
That's cool. I have found that the Sovteks (LPS) in the 659 were a a bit wooly in the mids for me, but I was going for a more "pristine", clear, balanced, articulate tone. To that end, NOS Telefunkens hit the nail on the head for me.
Tom.
tombowlus said:
I have some Telefunkens in my F2-B and they are outstanding, so smooth and musical sounding!
tombowlus said:
Interesting ... I actually haven't tried the NOS Telefunkens because of a write-up on the Tube Store website that suggests these are better in vintage amps. They are expensive too at $85 ea (actually this is my main objection) ... the tubes I've experimented with are all under $20 ea; the only NOS are my GE 5751 JANs which are very nice as well.
When you say 'wooly' can you explain a bit more? I've heard the word used, but don't have a good feel for what this means in terms of the sound.
- Apr 3, 2003
- 35,515
- 19,942
- Disclosures
- Editor-in-Chief, Bass Gear Magazine
westland said:
First off, you can find NOS Tele's for much less than that if you are patient and keep looking. I think I paid $35-40 each for mine (which is not cheap, but more reasonable, IMHO). By "wooly" I mean that the mids are a bit thick and not as well defined. What I am hearing is not so much low mids or high mids, but "middle mids" (tending towards higher mids). It kind of lends itself towards that "vintage tube vibe", so it's a matter of picking what sound you are after.
But, be aware that I also stongly prefer NOS JAN GE 5751's to the Sovtek LPS, too.
Tom.
tombowlus said:
Good information Tom (you are certainly the man to ask for first-hand experience on any piece of equipment
). "Wooly" sounds like a tone that would interest me, and maybe that's why I'm attracted to the LPS. I definitely like the NOS JAN GE 5751's ... very nice tubes, and they give me a sound that I'm after ... I found a store in town (Wei Wei) that sells them for about $11 ea, and bought several.Tell me your opinion on the 5751 vis a vis the LPS ... how do you find them different, and why do you prefer th LPS (I trust your opinion)
westland said:Good information Tom (you are certainly the man to ask for first-hand experience on any piece of equipment
Tell me your opinion on the 5751 vis a vis the LPS ... how do you find them different, and why do you prefer th LPS (I trust your opinion)
I can't talk about the specific preamps that you guys use, but I love my NOS JAN GE 5751s. Best $40 I ever spent (needed two) on an amp upgrade. Long live tubes.
- Apr 3, 2003
- 35,515
- 19,942
- Disclosures
- Editor-in-Chief, Bass Gear Magazine
- Apr 3, 2003
- 35,515
- 19,942
- Disclosures
- Editor-in-Chief, Bass Gear Magazine
westland said:
To my ears, those NOS JAN GE 5751's have a great blend of clarity and fullness, with good tonal balance. They aren't quite as open and airy as some of the NOS tubes I have played, and their lows aren't quite as forceful as some, but on the whole, they are a very competent peformer that doesn't seem to screw anything up. I will add, though, that I have heard a variety of "GE 5751's", and they can sound quite different. The Five Stars are the best I have heard.
As for the Sovtek LPS, they tend to fatten up the tone and smooth out the highs. There is a slight addition of mud and blurriness, too (at least compared to the "cleaner" tubes that I like, such as NOS Tele's, or new JJ's). While I generally prefer something else in much of my gear, I did find the Sovteks to be very beneficial in my Pignose B-100V (which was a Pig in need of fattening
).Tom.
