TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Right, that's why it's lasted for centuries virtually unchanged, unlike any other language on earth.I see you've already been well-corrected on the alleged demise of the English language, but you really need to be aware that tablature isn't threatening anything.
Tablature has been used for a variety of instruments for ages, and yet musical notation has still managed to stay relevant.
The only thing tablature does is make playing an instrument more accessible.
Then we have the problem that musical notation is far less than optimal. We have better, more logical alternatives, but people just stick to the old cumbersome notation because they're afraid of change. I wish it really were the case that easier systems could so quickly dethrone our current standard, because notation as we have it now just sucks.
Also, how exactly is it inaccessible? If my wife can figure out the basics in a couple days, with zero prior musical training, most people can.
Text message shorthand is now threatening English as written language in the same way that TAB is making music as a written language in danger of becoming obsolete.
While I'll agree the original statement is doubtful, it's sometimes shocking what students turn in. My son (just finished his freshman year of high school) gets A's and B's in English and even his teachers tell us there are parts of his papers that look like he's texting his friends in otherwise very good work. And they also tell us that he's far better than most at turning it off when it comes to written expression.This seems doubtful.
My name is THand, and I support the OP's statement.
While I'll agree the original statement is doubtful, it's sometimes shocking what students turn in. My son (just finished his freshman year of high school) gets A's and B's in English and even his teachers tell us there are parts of his papers that look like he's texting his friends in otherwise very good work. And they also tell us that he's far better than most at turning it off when it comes to written expression.
It seems as though, from a young age, kids get so used to the complete lack of clarity/completeness/effort/whatever that doesn't matter in text messages that, by the time they're in higher grades and need to write papers/tests/essays that require them to express themselves properly and in depth, they simply don't understand why they have to work so hard to do it or why the teacher "didn't get it" and lowered their grade for doing it. And my son is far from unique. The same is true with our friends kids, our nieces and nephews, our son's friends at other high schools.
Actually, I hadn't intended to tie that to the tab/notation discussion but, at least in some ways, it does sound quite similar.
It does give people much less incentive to go the extra mile and do it right, though. How many times have I heard a kid say, "Everyone knows what I'm talking about when I type this way, so who cares?" I'll tell you how many times...a lot! Or how many times do I hear someone on here say, "I'd like to read, but all my sheet music has notation and tab under it, and I always look at the tab"? So while it's possible to learn the right way subsequent to learning the shortcut way, the likelihood of it happening goes way down IMHO.Here's what I think:
It is possible to learn standard, written, academic English subsequent to learning text messaging, and the use of both systems doesn't cause one of them to atrophy.
It is possible to learn standard music notation subsequent to learning TAB, and the use of both systems doesn't cause one of them to atrophy.
It does give people much less incentive to go the extra mile and do it right, though. How many times have I heard a kid say, "Everyone knows what I'm talking about when I type this way, so who cares?" I'll tell you how many times...a lot! Or how many times do I hear someone on here say, "I'd like to read, but all my sheet music has notation and tab under it, and I always look at the tab"? So while it's possible to learn the right way subsequent to learning the shortcut way, the likelihood of it happening goes way down IMHO.
The price of printing two mags would be astronomical, and I think when you saw the price of a subscription after doing that, you'd change your mindAs a musician who reads, I do not like the inclusion of tabs on every piece of bass guitar music out there. Why should I be forced to put up with more page turns than are really necessary? Give an option to have or not have tabs, I'd be willing to pay more to keep tabs off my page.
The price of printing two mags would be astronomical, and I think when you saw the price of a subscription after doing that, you'd change your mind![]()
I hear you, Carl, but if a publisher told me I'd sell 50% more books if I added tab, guess what I'd be putting in my books?I'm not talking about magazines. I'm talking about books and sheet music aimed at bass players. If I'm on a reading session I do not want to be constantly flipping pages because the music is aimed at the hobbyist market.
I have spent more time re-doing in Finale music I've paid for to get rid of extra crap that publishers force on us. As some of you know, Finale isn't cheap and there is a learning curve to it as well. I generally do my own parts to everything I need. I'd sure like to be able to buy a usable product aimed for a pro, but the option isn't even there.
I'm not talking about magazines. I'm talking about books and sheet music aimed at bass players. If I'm on a reading session I do not want to be constantly flipping pages because the music is aimed at the hobbyist market.
I have spent more time re-doing in Finale music I've paid for to get rid of extra crap that publishers force on us. As some of you know, Finale isn't cheap and there is a learning curve to it as well. I generally do my own parts to everything I need. I'd sure like to be able to buy a usable product aimed for a pro, but the option isn't even there.
Nothing I said conflicts with your statements. It's certainly possible to learn to write well if you're a frequent and "typical" text messager. It's also possible to learn to sight read if you're a tab user. But does that mean that the typical content of text messages conveys the same amount of information and is as complete and expressive as well written English? I'd certainly never make that claim. Nor would I make the claim that tab is a complete as standard notation. It simply isn't.What you are suggesting, by analogy, would be that knowledge of TAB: a) impairs the ability to learn standard notation; and/or b) reduces the quality of one's use of already-acquired standard notation (by attrition?).
I think both of these are doubtful claims, just as I do the analogous claims regarding written English vis-a-vis texting.
Here's what I think:
It is possible to learn standard, written, academic English subsequent to learning text messaging, and the use of both systems doesn't cause one of them to atrophy.
It is possible to learn standard music notation subsequent to learning TAB, and the use of both systems doesn't cause one of them to atrophy.