Just don't get stuck in first position with an extension up the G string for higher notes.
Yep: that's what I did back in the mid-80s...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Just don't get stuck in first position with an extension up the G string for higher notes.
Seeing the intervals...of course it's always a good thing. Seeing the sharps and flats in the music when they're only written in the key signature? Very good. Reducing every piece of music you get to a scale or a position? Bad. Scales don't always apply, especially when you get stuff written with a lot of accidentals. People who play by scales often find themselves stuck in ruts where they sound like they're playing scales, and they find themselves caught short when they suddenly get yanked out of their comfort zones.I really want to learn to read standard notation on bass, but want to get on the right track.
With clarinet or sax it was simple: one note on staff *always* was fingered the same way. With bass, though, there are options. Also, unlike sax or clarinet, it is easy to transpose by moving up or down X frets.
OK, now my question. I found standard notation for a favorite song of mine: “Give it to me baby” by Rick James. 4 sharps, so key of E major. Find the “Es” on the staff. See the intervals, relative to the E major scale. Easy! I’m pretty good with scales, modes and intervals, so I could actually see the connection between those scales I practiced so much, and the “written music” I had as a kid on sax/clarinet.
But too easy?
Does the above sort-of make sense, or is it really necessary to learn positions, Simandl, etc? I know I need to be more comfortable with knowing where ALL the notes are on the fretboard and staff (which I am working on), but I am hoping that “seeing the intervals/scale” relative to the key is a valid way to read bass.
I am worried with positional/Simandl type playing, I would always struggle remembering sharps and flats in keys other than C.
Hopefully my question makes sense...
Having a good ear is always nice, but there's no reason not to learn how to read music. When you can do it, you can get better paying gigs that were previously not open to you. And I find it gives you a much better understanding of what you're hearing even if you don't use it on gigs.Another angle here is I don't, and would guess most players here generally don't use sheet music to learn music other than classical, musicals as part of pit band, complex prog, etc. Unless it's just for sight-reading practice, which can be valuable. As others have stated, fingerings, positions often need some advance working out. Easier to do that by ear, IMO.
...
People who play by scales often find themselves stuck in ruts where they sound like they're playing scales, and they find themselves caught short when they suddenly get yanked out of their comfort zones.
Having a good ear is always nice, but there's no reason not to learn how to read music. When you can do it, you can get better paying gigs that were previously not open to you. And I find it gives you a much better understanding of what you're hearing even if you don't use it on gigs.
Now, notation can also be great for expanding your vocabulary, a learning tool.
What people rarely mention about pursing notation: It improves your rhythm. In my experience , anyhow.
The difference between intuiting and knowing subdivisions and syncopations is night and day for me.
Also: things ambiguous when spoken are 100% concrete when notated. There is a benefit of clarity.
So true !What people rarely mention about pursing notation: It improves your rhythm. In my experience , anyhow.
The difference between intuiting and knowing subdivisions and syncopations is night and day for me.
Also: things ambiguous when spoken are 100% concrete when notated. There is a benefit of clarity.
One video had a g'tar player play all the combinations of sixteenth notes and rests: there are 16.
I dare say there are more than 16, depending on length of rest
I use Cliff Engle's PDF to practice rhythm reading, it has done me good.
Anthony's 'Yardstickof rhtyhm" is a good intro to subdivisions

One video had a g'tar player play all the combinations of sixteenth notes and rests: there are 16
Do your horn guys read?True. Never said not to learn to read notation. I did say that, for me, it's rare that I use it to learn a tune from the general rock/ popular music umbrella. I'm now in a soul band, 7-9pc with horns. Lotta classic stuff I never the chance to play. Some tunes with specific parts I prefer to nail. I just figure them out, no need for sheet music. Just saying guessing many of us here are the same. Now, notation can also be great for expanding your vocabulary, a learning tool. So it's both.