TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Then don't bother using them.
again... what difference?
How exactly would the tant different?
Toasted chimed in that it matters for a Red Llama clone, I'm just waiting to find out why![]()
i built a bass fuzz it's pretty brutal but i think the transistors or something i used aren't right because it sounds really glitchy
mojo
~ Charlie

I'm still confused whether this pedal is a fuzz or an overdrive. It is based on the Red Llame, an overdrive, but is called a fuzz.
I'm still confused whether this pedal is a fuzz or an overdrive. It is based on the Red Llame, an overdrive, but is called a fuzz.
^ That's pretty much what I was getting at, thanks Guttermouth![]()

the red llama can be used as both.here's a clip of mine that shows the range of the gain control :
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Great clips, and there's no arguing with that kind of evidence. That's pretty much what my clone sounds like too, so nice to have that aural reference point!
For my 2 pennies on this debate though, wasn't there a time when pretty much all distortion boxes were referred to as 'fuzz boxes', whether OD, distortion or fuzz?? Certainly from reading the CA book, he interchanges the terms, and for what it's worth, the description of the tube sound fuzz (in the book), is as follows: 'Recreates the types of distortion normally associated with tubes, but with a solid state design, for low current consumption, compactness and reliability.'
the red llama can be used as both.here's a clip of mine that shows the range of the gain control :
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]