I've been jonesing for a
real old-school J-bass for the longest time but the window has closed for me (& most other non-collectors) to obtain a genuine pre-CBS Fender Jazz. Even if I had the $10K+ to spend, I just couldn't justify that.
But I'm still curious, still lusting. So I've been looking at the Fender Custom Shop offerings, Relic, "Closet Classic" and NOS. Then I heard about the Nash basses and how they supposedly blow CS away on many levels. And they're many hundreds of dollars less. So I took a chance on one.
I won't lie: the fakeness of it does bug me. The finish on the back of the neck didn't get worn through, by a sweaty thumb or even a sander - it was never sprayed on to begin with. (Yeah, I can tell the difference.) When someone asks me what year is that thing, I get to explain.

(That's rare, though - most folks wouldn't discern a vintage J from a Johnson.) I still feel a more profound affinity for my other longtime axes, which all have stories to go along with each of the many dings & scratches they sport.
On the other hand, that Nash neck does feel nice. And I can lean it against the amp like I do with my other basses and not feel nervous or guilty. That's a plus. Most importantly, the bass sounds freakin' awesome - that's what makes it a keeper. (That and 3-tone sunburst.

)
Before, I was neutral. Now that I own a relic'd bass, I personally feel that fake wear & tear is a minus. (And that's what the relicing process is - fake is the only word to describe it.) I would definitely never pay extra to have it done.
But would I pay many hundreds more (thousands even) for a comparable piece
without fake wear? That's the dilemma Bill Nash presents us.