That would be a decent result, and I think it would be bad for the import brands, as well, which is a political issue I won't get into. Sure would help the "main street" music stores, which has to be a good thing. OTOH, GC got a lot of kids playing music, due to low cost of entry, so..........
I actually have some reasons for suspecting GC may go with "house branded" stuff for their lower end large volume products. I am pretty sure they have been considering it.
THAT would probably be not so good, as it would replace one overseas product set where the money at least supported well-known brands, with another set of overseas products that supports only GC. Probably not good for the well-known brands, on a number of levels.
And, we know that the house-brand stuff tends to creep upscale. Once that starts, it could nearly exterminate a number of brands that sell a lot at GC, some of which are Loud's.
The net result could be a lot less choice in the amp and instrument world. There could be a couple low-end house brand choices, a couple mid-priced house-brand choices, possibly one or two house brand "quality" choices and then a reduced number of lots pricier items from boutique makers. Period.
Hopefully this has stayed on the "quality of services" side of the debate.......
I actually have some reasons for suspecting GC may go with "house branded" stuff for their lower end large volume products. I am pretty sure they have been considering it.
THAT would probably be not so good, as it would replace one overseas product set where the money at least supported well-known brands, with another set of overseas products that supports only GC. Probably not good for the well-known brands, on a number of levels.
And, we know that the house-brand stuff tends to creep upscale. Once that starts, it could nearly exterminate a number of brands that sell a lot at GC, some of which are Loud's.
The net result could be a lot less choice in the amp and instrument world. There could be a couple low-end house brand choices, a couple mid-priced house-brand choices, possibly one or two house brand "quality" choices and then a reduced number of lots pricier items from boutique makers. Period.
Hopefully this has stayed on the "quality of services" side of the debate.......