Yeah and don't forget Cliff Burton. He sucked too right?
Oh yeah! Ha ha!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah and don't forget Cliff Burton. He sucked too right?
Originally Posted by Rob Martinez View Post
Rickenbackers are the worst bass in the world! That's why Paul McCartney, John Entwistle, Chris Squire, and Geddy Lee played them. Because they are the worst bass players in the world!
what do you love or hate about this bass?![]()


I don't hate the 4001 but sure do love the new 4003...and of course the 2 truss rods.
I'm kinda glad that not so many people like 'em, they're hard enough to get as it is.
If the demand were higher, the wait would be longer and the price would probably go up again.
I played Rics for ages, nothing else.
I always think - can you imagine any bassline ever, that wouldn't have sound better with a Ric?!!
You use the correct tense. The above played them - past tense! Paul and Chris may dig theirs out now and then for old times' sake, but Paul almost always has his Hofner in any appearance, Chris plays many other basses, and the others moved on when they found other basses they preferred.
I just don't see why anyone would bother to post, "I don't like Tha Soopa Bass by Soopa Bass Builders because the upper horn is too big!" or some crap like that. Unless it affects the function of the instrument I don't think anyone should be reviewing anything based on looks, because as all of us know it is extraordinarily subjective. Some of the fan club threads on here are a big LMAO Festival for me because of the pics people post, followed by many a "*drool*", and I look at the pictures and throw up a little. That's just the way it is for everyone regarding aesthetics... which I why I think people should be banned from reviewing anything based on that kind of criteria. I mean, I read Bass Player Magazine and half of the new bass reviews talk about the "awesome Jazz Bass body shape" (which is hilarious for a number of reasons when talking about a whole new model of bass and what to talk about when reviewing one) but to be honest, I think P Bass > Jazz Bass in terms of looks and, well, everything else. But some people are gaga over the Jazz Bass, and its sound, and whatever. I think looks, though, should just get tossed out the window when reviewing an instrument. Post a picture, let the people decide for themselves what's "classic" or "innovative" or "fugly".