Paul McCartneyChris Squire
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Paul McCartneyChris Squire
This is my story, as well. When I was in high school (late '70s), I was a huge fan of Chris and Geddy. I saved money from my grocery store job after school and bought a brand new blue Rick in 1978. I loved the sound, but the ergonomics were horrible for me. In college, I started getting more into reggae, fusion and jazz. I ended up trading my Rick for a Fender Jazz and I've never had the urge to buy another.When I was 20, there were two reasons I wanted a Rick: Chris Squire and Geddy Lee.
Whenever I've played a one though, it's always been a "don't meet your heroes" moment" - nothing about playing one has ever made me want to own one or even continue playing it for very long if I'm honest.
Did you mean mystique?What is the appeal and mystic of Rickenbacker?
Sounds similar to my experience, I worked summer jobs, mowed lawns etc. to save up for my first "real" bass, a 1978 4001 Jetglo, $450 with HSC at E.U. Wurlitzer, the biggest guitar store in Boston at the time. I was infatuated with that bass, but most of my college bandmates were not, "only makes one sound" (which wasn't true) but I was young and stupidly sold it after only three years, and instantly regretted it. Fast forward 47 years, now I've built three Ric clones, including a recent "Lemmy" 4004 LK tribute bass, with most of the inherent design issues fixed. The hard binding still chafes a bit, but I'm a sucker for the look. And I'm still a Squire/Geddy fan, so the tone just does it for me still. No doubt Rics are a bit "ergonomically challenged", they either fit you hands and body or they don't, in my case they still fit like a glove. They are polarizing basses, a lot of techs hated the double "hairpin" trussrods, and the later more standard ones, which were equally fragile. Every tech I ever took mine to adjusted them for equal tension on both rods. Introducing variable relief on the E and G strings has another name: "neck twist". They finally switched to a simple single modern DA trussrod that everyone knows how to adjust. the need or utility for double rods was always questionable at best, good riddance. In my case I had picked my 4001 out of a STACK of 5-6 basses, and picked the one with the thinnest neck. That may have been part of the problem, it never was particularly stable. They had really chunky baseball bat necks for a while, now they've gone back to the skinnier 70's profile. You might be pleasantly surprised if you picked one up now.... or not.This is my story, as well. When I was in high school (late '70s), I was a huge fan of Chris and Geddy. I saved money from my grocery store job after school and bought a brand new blue Rick in 1978. I loved the sound, but the ergonomics were horrible for me. In college, I started getting more into reggae, fusion and jazz. I ended up trading my Rick for a Fender Jazz and I've never had the urge to buy another.
Here! Here!The 4003 is by far the most famous rick bass…
But dont knock the 4005
Do you still have the V4B?Here's a pic from this morning and one from Feb 1979 recording.
That's interesting - i had a beautiful 4001 with a pretty thin 2-truss neck, and i wanted to love it so much, but i had a hard time getting comfortable playing with fingers. It felt better playing with a pick, but i didn't want to play everything with a pick, and that's the main reason i sold it on. I like the looks of the 4005, but haven't really tried one out.however, for me it was a pain to play standing up, in particular with a pick, because the right couldn't get a comfortable position except picking near the neck and so positioning the arm on the central part of the bass.
picking near the bridge is also difficult because there are >2cm of bridge with the foam mutes, and you can't palm mute.
You summed up my list in one sentence @woodyng2 !The main reason, besides the excellent list from mrab4003, is that they have a unique timbre that no other make quite captures.
And, it’s a very good one.
This! The 4003S is a great alternative to the regular 4003 if you want extra comfort. You will also save $250 off the list price if you buy one new. The 4003S is $2,250 and the 4003 is $2,500 on Sweetwater. Sweetwater got their prices from the Rickenbacker website, which has their official price list.Every bass has it's Pros and Cons, the most common gripe about Rics is the hard binding edge wearing on your forearm a little, which is true, but it’s no worse than any acoustic guitar, or a Tele. If it bothers you, get an S model, which has no binding and rounded edges. Ric had some poor QC for a while, which didn’t add to their reputation, but they seem to have solved them in recent years. Their “warranty” is still nearly worthless, as it requires the BUYER to pay one- way shipping to CA for any warranty repairs. Warranty starts on day of manufacture, not day of purchase, so nobody gets the full warranty period. No way to polish that turd, but people put up with it to get that TONE, there just isn’t anything exactly like it. The mute is effectively useless unless you leave it “on” or “off” all the time. Forget about adjusting it on the fly between songs ,you’d be better off with a piece of foam. On the Pro side, they are well balanced, look and sound great, and they have finally solved all the tail lift issues and changed out the crap double trussrod system to a modern DA trussrod, which makes the current 4003 the best they have ever built IMO. Maybe more than any other bass out there, you really need to play one, but it can be difficult to find one in stock at a store, most get pre-sold before they ever get to showroom floor.
You're right about this! But I had to think about my moment before posting. This is my Rickenbacker "origin story":The appeal of a Ric? I'd wager that upward of 90% of the Ric players in this forum shared one single thought the moment they saw a Ric for the first time after they started playing bass, and that thought was "I gotta have one of these".
I agree, but Paul failed to get it to sound like a Hofner, imo. The Rickenbacker has its own thing going on.Oddly enough, it always seemed to me like Macca was trying to make his Ric sound like a Hofner, flats with all the treble rolled off, but it goes to show that the “one trick pony” thing is complete BS. Rics are as versatile as any 2 pup bass, but only a Ric sounds like a Ric with rounds and treble cranked. It’s very much a Bass Guitar, which is what hooked me in the first place.
And, that was a good thing, too.I agree, but Paul failed to get it to sound like a Hofner, imo.