I own no Rickenbackers. I have no plans to own a Rickenbacker, because, among other things, I feel the price point is set artificially high.
What turns me off is that without fail, every discussion about Rickenbackers turns into some testosterone fueled dicksize contest.
I don't see this sort of zealotry with any other manufacturer, any other instrument model or style.
You can go right now to TDPRI.com, formerly telecaster.com, and read positive, helpful threads about everything from Warmoth parts guitars to Japanese tele copies. Nobody cops an attitude and talks about fakes and copies, nobody opines about stealing Fender's livelihood.
And certainly, the Fender Corporation doesn't send out it's team of litigious ninja monkeys any time someone draws a picture of a tele on the back of a napkin.
I've played Ricks from the 70's, 80's and 90's at various places. I found them to be decent, reasonable basses, with uncomfortable necks, usually priced about 20% more than I'd pay, even on a splurge.
If I ask here "I'm thinking I need a bit more low mids from my P-Bass, do you think a set of Quarter Pounders would help?", I'll get reasonable responses.
If I ask the same about a 4003 on RickResource, I'll be branded a heretic and told that nothing short of the pickups that are carved out of John Hall's ass by a team of specially trained Gnomes will do.
From the rickenbacker.com forum in [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
While I'm sure there are reasonable people over there, it's not worth it to filter the signal from the noise. There's nothing I've ever asked my P-Bass, my J-Bass, nor my Alembic Spoiler that they haven't been able to do. Pass.
We now return this horribly derailed thread to it's original poster.
- 1 I thought about going through and refuting most of your points but that would take too long. It is your opinion but mine happens to be the opposite. Although I cannot speak to other forums because TB is really the only forum I participate in on an active basis.
When people say they are expensive I cannot help but ask as in compared to what? To paraphrase George Costanza- it's only expensive if you think it is-I use Rics and that's all. They just work for me. So what would be the point of me buying another bass $400 to $500 cheaper that I don't like or want? I bought an EBMM Sterling in April 07 for $1500. i bought a Ric 4003 in June 07 for $1600. Both new. I know prices have risen but how is it that rarely do I see people saying that EBMMs are overpriced yet there are constantly posts saying that Rics are. I don't understand.
I also think that Ric users are protective of Rics and maybe slightly fanatical lol because they are an original American made bass that hasn't been copied to death. When you sit and watch a band you know that the guy playing the Ric is playing a Ric. When you see a guy playing a P-bass you know that it could be a P-bass made by countless different companies. Not a flame. Just reality.
My 2 cents.


