Better than half of the issues are untrue? Why don't you bring up the untrue myths and lets shake this out because although some of these issues are overplayed, there are most certainly design and quality issues with a Rics...both present and past.
Without speaking for Rickenboogie I think his point is why does this thread exist? You don't see threads asking for the bad points of Fender J or P basses. Or EBMM bad points. In reality I doubt there is a bass built that is 100% perfect to 100% of the people. Simply can't be.
I haven't read all the posts but here are a few thoughts.
IMO Rics have gotten a reputation for being pricey and which has brought on some of the negativity. But that is perception. I compare them to other American made basses and their price doesn't seem that out of line. They are only pricey if a person isn't willing to pay the sticker. A new EBMM SR 4 HH is close to $1700 in the stores around here. A Ric would be about $300 more. Is it worth $300 more? I don't know. But it is the price.
IMO a lot of the "issues" are simply part of the Ric experience/design.
An example - the binding issue. Is this really an issue? If you don't like the binding don't buy a Ric. It's how they are built. It doesn't bother me.
The only "issue" I will say there might be is with the bridge. It is awkward to work with but once it is set up you usually do not have to fiddle with it much. I have a Hipshot replacement bridge on one of my Rics that is probably going to be swapped back to the original. The Hipshot saddles just move too much for me.
IMO a lot the "issues" are perception issues. Either you like the bass or you don't.
I still have a lot of respect for the fact that Ric has not gotten into mass, overseas production.
