What makes you think that I thought that this was common??
I've got lots of first-hand experience with anti-Ric spin. First, you post that highly suspicious photo. And then comes this...
The fact is though, that i've read more threads about QC issues in regards to Rics than any other bass on the planet. Part of this may be that their owners expect more from a $2000 bass and are picky, but part of it is also that you should expect to have no issues in a $2000 bass. Part of it may be that when a rare issue strikes it's a crap fight to get it fixed by the Ric factory without jumping through hoops and paying for shipping yourself prompting the owner to start a thread here.
A page right out of the Ric Haters Manual. Cliche much? (BTW, anyone who pays $2K for a new Ric 4003 is a chump, they can be had from several highly reputable Ric dealers for more like $1,599 every day, and these folks will have your back if it's not 100%--but exaggeration is also a chapter of the Ric Haters Manual).
Here's the bottom line:
If this, and any other of the other reported well known issues (finish problems and crooked pickup installation for example) that are written about on this site by Ric owners were too common, they wouldn't still be selling them quicker than they can make them.
Remarkably, despite the efforts of the tiny vocal minority, smart consumers know that one bad apple don't spoil the whole bunch. That must be why there are so many silent but happy Ric owners out there and so many lining up for one.
Maybe we don't hear about it from other manufacturers basses so much as they fix problems without drama.
Ho ho ho! Good one! Oh, wait...you're serious bro? Um, okay...
Last edited:
