• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ridiculous Ways To Describe Tone

I collect vintage hi-fi stuff and have a substantial vinyl LP collection. I love playing it on very nice equipment. As much as I love playing my LP's, there is no way I would argue they sound better than a CD from the same source. It's not even close. Yet a lot of people say vinyl sounds "warmer". Yeah, and people say tube hi-fi amps sound "warmer".

Warm = distortion.

It's great in a guitar amp. Not so much in a system designed to reproduce music, adding as little color as possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim Nazium
Kinda reminds me of the wine snobs describing wine. "I'm tasting some woodsy tones with a fruity nose and a floral finish" lol! So pretentious!

I always thought "tubby" was a silly description for bass. Even though it kinda makes sense.
Oh... and "Slaptastic" was another good one.
I am the wine snob you are referring to. it isn't pretentious to those who are passionate about wine.

if I have to explain, you wouldn't understand.
 
Might it, however, be accurate to say Warm = second order harmonic distortion ?
Could. Distortion is great in an amp used to CREATE music. But terrible in an amp used to REPRODUCE music. Even second order harmonic distortion. I really love what tube distortion does for guitar. Heck, I love what a super resonant wooden box does for the sound of a violin. It wouldn't work for a loudspeaker, though.
 
Someone on here was selling a bass whose tone he described as "pillowy". Another person described the EQ on a particular amp as being very "musical" - as opposed to what?

Though I can't speak for that person, and though sonic characteristics that are not typically "musical" may be used to make excellent music by someone, ever, I do use the term "musical" to describe some audio devices, so here's my take:

As opposed to merely accurate or functional.

That is, for that listener, in that application, the processor (or pickup or whatever) performs in a way that sounds more like music (best of all), or at least more like a musical instrument (still good), than like a technical instrument (not so good, unless you're making music that capitalizes on such devices and the sounds they tend to enable).
 
Last edited:
Between burpy basses and farty cabs it's a wonder we don't have more females around here.

I've never dreamed of describing any tone as "burpy" before I started reading these forums and I still have no idea what it's supposed to mean. But the most ridiculous terminology I've heard has been "haunting mids" and "breathy compression," both of which, I believe, originated on TGP.

I've seen "burpy" used in reviews in Bass Player mag since the 90's. I've always found it a silly adjective to use for bass tone.