• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Right to left? Why?

How did it become the standard that pedals have their inputs on the right and outputs on the left? The signal flow on my board ends up being opposite the way I experience music. We read books left to right. We read music notation and chord charts left to right. DAWs and media player progress bars scroll the music so that the next note is to the right of the first note. Our gain-stages and EQs on our amps are laid out from left to right low to high. Never seen the treble knob to the left of the bass knob. (oh the exception I know of on that would be the tone controls on my pedulla hexabuzz).
I am curious how it evolved opposite the way so many other things go. Does any one else wish signal path went the other way when they were setting up their pedal boards? I know it doesn't really matter as it all works the same. Still the question remains.
PLEASE no liberal/conservative puns or comments as that can derail this in a direction I don't want to go here. i want to discuss pedals in this thread.
 
Right-handed basses and guitars have their outputs on the right (from the perspective of the instrumentalist). Standard pedal configuration for the vast majority of players who are right-handed means you're not running your cable across your body/board. I think that's pretty much the end of the story.
 
The simple answer that I've read is Jimi Hendrix. When Rodger Mayer was building and modifying pedals for Hendrix he wired them as such because of Hendrix playing left handed (although he wrote right handed). But his work/signal flow was left handed.

C/S,
Rev J
 
Also note that bob gallien prefers the eq mirrored from the norm.

Iow gk amps have treble on the left and bass on the right.
That was actually a result of how he designed and built his first his tone stack and he still addresses the tone stack signal flow the same in terms of frequencies to this day. At least that is what I recall from an interview with him where he discussed his designs.
 
Here is the applicable excerpt from the Bob Gallien interview I mentioned above regarding the uniqueness of the GK tone stack:

Q&A with Bob Gallien by Tom Bowlus


We all greatly enjoyed hanging out with Bob Gallien at the Winter NAMM Show, but I couldn’t resist a few more follow-up questions to share with our readers.


Q: Your heads use a serial equalization section. Why is this important?
A: When I started (1967), bass amplifiers used a very simple three-control passive “T” tone stack popular in guitar amplifiers. This tone stack works great for guitars and is the main EQ system in use to this day for guitar. I realized early on that to solve the problems bass players were having (power, punch, and clarity), an entirely new approach was required. A different power amp topology and more detailed equalizer was the answer. The typical way then to get more EQ was to use a graphic equalizer. The problem with this type of equalizer is that it is designed to reduce room resonances, and because of the parallel band configuration, they introduced resonances of their own. These things were never intended to equalize instruments, and for the most part only made the problems worse. I worked on the problem mathematically for several months (over a hundred pages of loop equations, all by hand) and came up with the serial equalizer solution we

use to this day. This equalizer requires a lot more parts, but provides the maximum usable response modification without introducing resonances and nulls of its own. It is popular to test equalizers by sweeping them with a signal generator and showing the response. This type of testing does not really show the important characteristics of an equalizer. In the real world, an equalizer is presented with thousands of frequencies at the same time and in this condition the parallel equalizer will produce many nulls and resonances
that make things sound false. The GK serial equalizer does not have this problem. The proper test method for equalizers is to use square waves for the signal. Square waves contain thousands of frequencies and will accurately show how an equalizer actually behaves. Square waves will show severe ringing in high-Q parallel equalizers, reflecting the artificial character of the resulting sound they produce (as well as all the other undesirable anomalies). These undesirable responses are absent in the GK equalizer, which means it provides useful equalization over the full range of its controls.

Q: I notice that you set up your EQ section “backwards” from the norm, from high to low. Why is that?
A: My first amplifiers that used the serial equalizer (300B, 600B) were hand-wired with terminal strips. In order to reduce noise, a serial equalizer must have the high frequency bands first, so with handwiring the high frequency pots had to come first. I can always tell when the competition has been looking at my designs, because for no reason at all they run their equalizer high to low. To my knowledge, GK is the only company using a serial equalizer, therefore the only company with a reason to run the equalizer from high to low.
 
Last edited:
How did it become the standard that pedals have their inputs on the right and outputs on the left? The signal flow on my board ends up being opposite the way I experience music. We read books left to right. We read music notation and chord charts left to right. DAWs and media player progress bars scroll the music so that the next note is to the right of the first note. Our gain-stages and EQs on our amps are laid out from left to right low to high. Never seen the treble knob to the left of the bass knob. (oh the exception I know of on that would be the tone controls on my pedulla hexabuzz).
I am curious how it evolved opposite the way so many other things go. Does any one else wish signal path went the other way when they were setting up their pedal boards? I know it doesn't really matter as it all works the same. Still the question remains.
PLEASE no liberal/conservative puns or comments as that can derail this in a direction I don't want to go here. i want to discuss pedals in this thread.
Why?
Cuz that's the way it's always been !
if it's not broken why fix it!
 
my TB500 has Treb on the left , bass on the right....has the switch "upside down" too, with up for off and the input is on the right

93b7bf_dd65a7fcde374fa79a7d1db201fb0af2.jpg
 
Because MXR did it that way :roflmao: Then Boss and DOD followed suit.

Electro Harmonix was the first mfr to offer a full line of pedals, before that companies made only one or two so there weren't standard sizes and shapes and there was no standardization of any kind about jack locations. EH of course put their jacks on the back! Anyone who owns a lot of vintage pedals will tell you what a PITA it is to have some jacks on the back, some R->L, some L->R.
 
Right-handed basses and guitars have their outputs on the right (from the perspective of the instrumentalist). Standard pedal configuration for the vast majority of players who are right-handed means you're not running your cable across your body/board. I think that's pretty much the end of the story.
Any answer after this one (though admittedly, some of them are funny) is redundant.