To me, hating fake wear and/or calling it fake-old is kind of funny. Although I don't disagree with the term "fake-old," what qualifies as fake-old?
Consider this: I take good care of my instruments. I have many basses that I have bought new. Basses I bought new 20 years ago still looks almost like new because I take good care of my gear. I also have a friend who is a guitar player. Try as he might to "be careful," his instruments fairly quickly pick up dents, dings and chips. A guitar he has may be newer and yet look older than a bass of mine. Are his guitars fake-old because he causes them to wear faster than I do? Should I be more careless with my instruments so that I can get some of the visual "mojo" that his instruments have? Or should I just buy a roadworn instrument? (Full disclosure: I do own a roadworn instrument.)
Consider this: I take good care of my instruments. I have many basses that I have bought new. Basses I bought new 20 years ago still looks almost like new because I take good care of my gear. I also have a friend who is a guitar player. Try as he might to "be careful," his instruments fairly quickly pick up dents, dings and chips. A guitar he has may be newer and yet look older than a bass of mine. Are his guitars fake-old because he causes them to wear faster than I do? Should I be more careless with my instruments so that I can get some of the visual "mojo" that his instruments have? Or should I just buy a roadworn instrument? (Full disclosure: I do own a roadworn instrument.)