• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Roasted vs. "Torrified" (StewMac) - anyone know the differences?

bholder

Affable Sociopath
Gold Supporting Member
Supporting Member
Sep 2, 2001
32,357
87,039
Vestal, NY
Disclosures
Received a gift from Sire* (see sig)
From the StewMac site:

Torrefaction: the advantages of vintage wood
One of the great things about a really old instrument is the way the wood has aged over decades. It becomes a little drier and denser, and much more dimensionally stable. And aging darkens the color beautifully. When they can get it, builders love to use wood salvaged from very old buildings, for example.

The qualities of these rare aged woods are successfully recreated by heating wood in a low-oxygen environment using a kiln—a difficult process called Torrefaction. This torrefied wood has the color, dimensional stability and other advantages of those long-aged woods that are so hard to come by.​

Sounds like roasting, other than making it low-oxygen (which maybe roasting naturally does? not sure). Anyway, looks like StewMac is jumping on the bandwagon, just wondering if anyone knows anything about their "torrefaction" process vs. roasting (either process itself or comparison of results).

Anyone?
 
I'm just wondering if the StewMac version of the process (or that of whoever they get it from) is done in an oxygen free environment (easy enough, I guess, fill with CO2 or nitrogen or whatever's appropriate) - do other roasters do the same?