Ok, my faithful watchers,
Today was another whirlwind day, full of action! Quite a bit was accomplished on the acoustic and a few desicions were made. First, I FINALLY got the sides thickness sanded to .085", sanded the "top" side smooth, used a side template for dreadnaught, traced the outline, cut the scrap (which I saved) and...
There you go! There are arrows indicating the top side, the upper and lower edges, for meeting up in the mold.
The back was planed down, to remove any glue and reveal the true beauty of the seam, and, I gotta tell you, I think I hit this one out of the park! We discussed using a backstrip, and the different choices, which are nice, but...,
this seam is simply too nice to ruin with a backstrip. The bookmatching lines up beautifully, the color is exquisite, and, laquer will simply creep into the seam created by the backstrip, so...no.
The spruce top was planed yesterday, which also turned out awesome, no visible seam, all fingerprints were removed, so today, we drew the outline with a mold, cut the excess off of the top (for bracing use later) measured for the soundhole, and cut the excess off from the top, leaving at least 1/4" outside the template line. That will probably be explained later.
We also recieved our acoustic neck blanks (mahogany). We had to pair up with someone because of the way the necks are cut out. I will go into further detail later. I'm not sure if I got a good picture of those, but, they are lurking in the other pictures.
Now...ON TO THE BASS!!!!!
We selected our tops yesterday, and I was happy with the figure. When I started to look at the thickness of the wood, and where the actual figure would lie on the body, I was not so happy. The lowest part of the bookmatch seam was only .050" thick. Way too small to really make a good seam with wood that was .250" on the other side. Plus, with the design of my body, the quilt would only be below my bridge. I consulted one of the instructors (more for the thickness, than the figure) and, because I had not sanded anything, he found a MUCH nicer piece, with very nice quilt, for the same price. It was bowed, and I will find out tomorrow, when I take it out from clamping, if I have to redo the seam. You guys have no idea how long I sanded to get that seam close, well, some of you probably do know... anyway, here's piece number two...
I absolutely love the quilt on this...It will look phenomenal(sp?)! The design aspect of a "drop top" came into play today. If we wanted it, we would need our bridge and pickup placement ironed out. Kris (the head electric guy, and a bass player) had a SR 4 body, with the correct measurement for the pickup. He brought that in, and I measured the correct distance for the pickup....wait...he had a Stingray body...wasn't that what I need to make an accurate tamplate...hmmmm. I might ask if I can redo my design(very quickly) I will have tonight to think about it, as class is moving very fast. Give me some opinions...CT, I know what you want...
My last picture...we were given the choice of our electric fingerboards. ebony, cocobola, or zircote. The cocobola was the cheapest, but, guys...I do not want that headache this early into the build. The ebony was the most expensive, and the zircote...
...was callin' my name. Check out the sapwood on that! And yes, I am keeping the sapwood!
So, I have accomplished quite a bit today, but, I am still considering changing things around. I like the contemporary feel of my design
with this:
and this:
But, I would like to stick to the original plan, a high class stingray, probably with 22 frets, we will see, and all the other classic SR goodies. BTW, no matter if I keep my design or copy the SR body, I am keeping the 3+1 headstock.
Very Tired,
Thumpin_P