• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

"Rock" vs. "Pop" music classification

Jul 20, 2005
7,055
7,931
This is JUST FOR FUN! :)
Please, no "It's all subjective and these threads are pointless" replies.

I was pondering how I, personally, tend to pigeonhole rock and pop music. It's a continuum, of course, and I'm also the last person who should be doing this, since I do believe in the "there are only two kinds of music: good and bad" bit.
But, JUST FOR FUN, I came up with these criteria. To be "rock" music, it has to contain 3 out of 4 of them:
A) Guitars and drums are present, and sometimes piano and/or saxophone. Roots (however distant) in the blues/country fusion which created rock 'n' roll. Chuck Berry, Little Richard, Jerry Lee Lewis, Bo Diddley, Fats Domino.
B) "Organic" construction-- the members need to have come together naturally (schoolmates (U2), or colleagues on the scene (Cream)) and not have been assembled by the music biz machine (Monkees).
C) A do-it-yourself ethic-- the band members write the material, the level of performance is "raw and untrained", and originality is a goal.
D) An anti-authority attitude, and usually some youthful angst and anger. "Music made by young people FOR young people." Parents are repulsed.

The Rolling Stones, Queen, the Clash, Black Sabbath, Radiohead, R.E.M., Foo Fighters, Bruce Springsteen and the Beach Boys obviously have A, B, C, and D (to give a few examples).

Steely Dan has a polished level of execution, but I'd say that they have all of the rest. I think the sarcasm of their lyrics gives them D.

Yes, King Crimson and Rush don't have D, there is very little of the blues/country roots thing, and their level of execution is polished, but they have the rest, including loud guitars and drums, and fierce originality. Rock music.

The Beatles have (had) A, B, C and D. If you think their early days lacked D, you didn't see them juxtaposed on TV and radio against someone like Robert Goulet in a tuxedo singing a Broadway tune. A stark contrast. Parents were horrified by the hair and by the "blaring" guitars and "pounding" drums. Where are Steve Lawrence and Eydie Gorme with their Cole Porter medley??

Elton John and Billy Joel? They could have been Tin Pan Alley writers, so to me they are on the brink of pop. But since they do write, and because they contain ever-so-slight vestiges of Little Richard and Elvis, they JUST make it into rock for me.

OK, maybe some of you will have FUN with this FUN little thread, which is intended to be FUN! :D (Hopefully, I won't be sorry... :bag: ;))
 
Last edited:
I'd disagree about "...An anti-authority attitude, and usually some youthful angst and anger..." in the work of Rush and King Crimson. Have you listened to the lyrics?
There's some understated anti-authority lyrics among Crimson tracks; maybe not extended middle finger stuff, but in "Epitaph" there's the line "the fate of all mankind is in the hands of fools", "Schizoid Man" is full of horrific visions("innocents raped with napalm fire"…a jab at the Vietnam war), and later, on "Ladies Of The Road", it's a shopping list of all the kinky chicks that randy boys on tour would encounter. Not a tune you'd play for your mom. As for other stuff, I'd have to go back and analyze all the eras, there were different lyricists and different attitudes. As for Rush, I don't know 'cause I don't care.
 
Rock vs Pop. Interesting. I think about this often. The meaning of the terms have changed radically over the years. Here is my definition that spans all time:

Pop: Something that is popular and your parents are just as likely to like as you.

Rock: Turn that down!
Not bad! My father liked Three Dog Night and was disgusted by Mick Jagger.
 
"Pop" on its own isn't a genre of music. It's just music that's easily consumable, typically by the younger generation. Pretty much any genre can be made into pop. On a side note, IMO anti-authority is more of a punk rock thing than rock as a whole.
Ahh, so Dylan is punk rock? Did not know that. Actually, someone like Eddie Cochran was an inspiration for late 70's punks, and he was always complaining about the man holding him down. Bratty, Stones influenced circa '66 garage rock as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max Bogosity
There's some understated anti-authority lyrics among Crimson tracks; maybe not extended middle finger stuff, but in "Epitaph" there's the line "the fate of all mankind is in the hands of fools", "Schizoid Man" is full of horrific visions("innocents raped with napalm fire"…a jab at the Vietnam war), and later, on "Ladies Of The Road", it's a shopping list of all the kinky chicks that randy boys on tour would encounter. Not a tune you'd play for your mom. As for other stuff, I'd have to go back and analyze all the eras, there were different lyricists and different attitudes. As for Rush, I don't know 'cause I don't care.
That's cool. I'm not especially a fan of, or knowledgeable about , progressive rock music... you learn something new every day!
 
"Pop" on its own isn't a genre of music. It's just music that's easily consumable, typically by the younger generation. Pretty much any genre can be made into pop. On a side note, IMO anti-authority is more of a punk rock thing than rock as a whole.
Some people break it down into "art music" (Western classical), "folk music" (field recordings of prisoners on a chain gang singing a work song), "sacred music" and "popular music." Therefore, they would consider John Coltrane (and the Sex Pistols) "popular music."
I disagree about punk rock largely owning the anti-authority thing. When the Rolling Stones peed on the wall of a gas station, circa 1965, that qualified. Anyway, Little Richard's appearance and demeanor, alone, was a "middle finger" during the Eisenhower '50s. So was Elvis's pelvis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max Bogosity
This falls down at the end of the day, by use of a simple example: people slightly younger than my dad would have considered The Beatles to be rock. Meanwhile, I once asked my dad if he ever saw The Beatles live and he said he did, but it really didn't seem like he considered it a big deal. He considered The Beatles to be music for kids, and never took them to be anything but pop music. Plus, you could barely hear the band for all the girls screaming. One young person's rebellious band is something that people a few years older look at and go, "Yeah, whatever." It's why I never took Marilyn Manson seriously, for example, despite people much older and much younger getting worked up about them for differing reasons.

Now back to my dad and his concert experiences…In contrast to The Beatles, he lit up when talking about seeing James Brown live, and he and his friends even set out to go meet him after the show at his motel. To you and I, this probably doesn't seem like a big deal, but this was in the south during segregation.

When you think about it, the story of Rock was always pitched about being this corrupting force on the youth of America, and by corrupting I mean getting them to do things that their parents' generation tried to prevent. Now answer me this, which would have been more shocking to the adults of their generation: Some girls screaming at clean cut English guys wearing suits, or a bunch of young white guys going to see an African-American performer at a segregated venue, and then seeking him out at a Blacks-only motel?

As a postscript, when I was a kid, we mostly listened to cassettes while driving. When my parents were doing all the music selection, the two types of music on rotation were either the modern pop-country of Alabama and The Oak Ridge Boys, or Motown/southern Soul/beach music. And for those that think beach music is The Beach Boys and other SoCal artists of the 60s, I'm talking about The Drifters, The Coasters, Maurice Williams and the Zodiacs, The Tams, etc — all the music that formed the beach culture of the Carolinas back in the day.
 
This needs a Venn Diagram

e7674d22e392b1679c3803547531bc25.png
 
Ahh, so Dylan is punk rock? Did not know that. Actually, someone like Eddie Cochran was an inspiration for late 70's punks, and he was always complaining about the man holding him down. Bratty, Stones influenced circa '66 garage rock as well.
Can you please point to me where I said rock music can't be anti-authority?