Anyone own or play one of these cheap Hofner knock offs? How are they, generally speaking. MF has them for $179 shipped and I'm thinking of taking a chance sight unseen.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yeah I've got one. Great bass, seems sturdier built than the Hofner Icon. The tuning keys are standard bass keys, not the Hofner banjo style, which detracts a little bit from the look but, again, that contributes to the feel that's it's more likely to last the long haul. I was very surprised when I got mine how much I liked it. I bought a hardshell case for it, cost me half what the bass did but it seemed too nice an instrument to not have a case.
Yeah, I watched a few YouTube videos of them last night and from what I saw, they seems to be ok. The videos reproduced that Beatle sound pretty accurately. I think it's worth a shot getting it shipped up here.
I have the Rogue and it's a very nice bass but I prefer my Brice...it's black and a full hollowbody, whereas the Rogue is sunburst and has a very small bridge block.
I have the Rogue and it's a very nice bass but I prefer my Brice...it's black and a full hollowbody, whereas the Rogue is sunburst and has a very small bridge block.
Is the bridge block a negative or just personal preference?
Well, it can improve sustain. But on a Hofner one usually wants notes to decay quickly.
True but a foam insert will do that for me (McCartney jammed a foam block under the strings at the bridge)
Is the bridge block a negative or just personal preference?
Then again the Brices are both black and the Rogue and Epi are 'burst so maybe it's just the finish...
I own a Rogue as well as a "real" Hofner Club bass. Hofner lovers are quick to dismiss the cheap knockoffs as paling in comparison, but come on! How quickly we forget that original Hofners WERE cheap instruments before a certain Liverpudlian put them on the map and compelled them to use his affiliation to mark up their instruments to astronomical (read: way overpriced, IMO) prices. That's exactly why McCartney bought one. He couldn't afford a Fender at the time, the Hofner was cheap, and symmetrical. So you want the truth? I think the Rogue is better in many respects. Not nearly as flimsy feeling, a bit heavier, and the tone is classic Hofner with a bit more punch and clarity. Yes, aesthetically they're not as nice. The pickguard and control plates are cheap looking and not as nice as the Hofner pearloid ones, and the banjo tuners look cooler on a Hofner too. But truthfully, the control knobs and switches are cheap plastic junk on a Hofner too.
For about $2200 less than a Hofner and offering 99% of the tone and build arguably better in some respects, it's a no brainer.
... How quickly we forget that original Hofners WERE cheap instruments...That's exactly why McCartney bought one. He couldn't afford a Fender at the time, the Hofner was cheap, and symmetrical... For about $2200 less than a Hofner and offering 99% of the tone and build arguably better in some respects, it's a no brainer.
I own a Rogue as well as a "real" Hofner Club bass. Hofner lovers are quick to dismiss the cheap knockoffs as paling in comparison, but come on! How quickly we forget that original Hofners WERE cheap instruments before a certain Liverpudlian put them on the map and compelled them to use his affiliation to mark up their instruments to astronomical (read: way overpriced, IMO) prices. That's exactly why McCartney bought one. He couldn't afford a Fender at the time, the Hofner was cheap, and symmetrical. So you want the truth? I think the Rogue is better in many respects. Not nearly as flimsy feeling, a bit heavier, and the tone is classic Hofner with a bit more punch and clarity. Yes, aesthetically they're not as nice. The pickguard and control plates are cheap looking and not as nice as the Hofner pearloid ones, and the banjo tuners look cooler on a Hofner too. But truthfully, the control knobs and switches are cheap plastic junk on a Hofner too.
For about $2200 less than a Hofner and offering 99% of the tone and build arguably better in some respects, it's a no brainer.

I've had similar views about SX Fender copies ...![]()
Exactly, why spend all that money for a Fender when you get a serviceable instrument at about 1/10 the cost?
amenI own a Rogue as well as a "real" Hofner Club bass. Hofner lovers are quick to dismiss the cheap knockoffs as paling in comparison, but come on! How quickly we forget that original Hofners WERE cheap instruments before a certain Liverpudlian put them on the map and compelled them to use his affiliation to mark up their instruments to astronomical (read: way overpriced, IMO) prices. That's exactly why McCartney bought one. He couldn't afford a Fender at the time, the Hofner was cheap, and symmetrical. So you want the truth? I think the Rogue is better in many respects. Not nearly as flimsy feeling, a bit heavier, and the tone is classic Hofner with a bit more punch and clarity. Yes, aesthetically they're not as nice. The pickguard and control plates are cheap looking and not as nice as the Hofner pearloid ones, and the banjo tuners look cooler on a Hofner too. But truthfully, the control knobs and switches are cheap plastic junk on a Hofner too.
For about $2200 less than a Hofner and offering 99% of the tone and build arguably better in some respects, it's a no brainer.