bigd4207 said:Somebody please KILL THIS THREAD! PPPPLLLLEEEEAAASSSSEEE!!!!!!!
It must be a real bitch being forced to click on a thread title.
My condolences.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
bigd4207 said:Somebody please KILL THIS THREAD! PPPPLLLLEEEEAAASSSSEEE!!!!!!!

SMASH said:The post you reference is in a thread about basses in general not about his basses, it replies to a post made about basses in general not about his basses, he makes this statement "Absolute nonsense. [...] I can absolutely, positively tell you that maple is much brighter than rosewood and ebony has the most punch. [...] Show me a quote from any reputable bass builder who says otherwise." and in no way states he was only talking about his own basses (nor did he even claim it later when he clarified, or backed off on as the case may be, his position), and when he draws "any other reputable builder" into it this suggests that he's saying it's also true of other basses, or at least those built by "reputable builders".
As was pointed out to you, it's all been resolved now anyway. You're on your own.

Fuzzbass said:I was actually asking *you* if you agreed with Roger Sadowsky: that the fingerboard affects tone more than the body or neck. Do you agree?
I'd say he has.Brad Johnson said:Your turn. No doubt you've proven something.
![]()
This has what to do with Rosewood/Maple?Brad Johnson said:I didn't drag anyone through the stupidity you initiated in the Lobby. That was your apparently conscious decision. If you make that decision again it's on you.
Akami said:This has what to do with Rosewood/Maple?
You're also the most antagonistic poster here and you're now trying to see if you can turn another thread into a verbal fistfight like last year.
If you want to drag everyone through that again then go ahead. Maybe you can get us both banned next time on top of getting another thread closed.
Moo said:I'd say he has.

dougjwray said:If I pour maple syrup on a rosewood fingerboard, will it sound brighter?
And if I pour rosewood syrup on my pancakes, will they sound more like a 1962 Jazz Bass?
Joebone said:But if one plays bass with one's hands, isn't the FEEL of the fingerboard an important element in the sound one ultimately produces?
If you have slick, polished maple under your hands, you are going to have a very different feeling, and therefore play and sound differently, than if you have a grabby rosewood board that responds in a very different way when you dig in. This will have ramifications for how you shape the sound of each note with your left hand, and I think it ultimately influences musical decisions. If you get the positive feedback of a warm feeling and sound off of Rosewood, you're gonna be more inclined to play that way - and if you're slipsliding on Maple, with that hard surface responding to your vibrato and pressure in a very different way, you'll playing will probably follow suit.
Me, I think I'm leaning to ebony as a happy medium between these poles, but I try to be openminded. Nonetheless, I do think the fingerboard makes a significant difference in musical output, although that difference my stem more from the nature of the user-fingerboard interface than from tonal characteristics inherent in each type of wood.
bucephylus said:It's a good thing we resolved this question. In the future, we can reference people to this thread and the whole question will become instantly clear. The thread could becaome a sticky for permanent reference!![]()
OK, more seriously, doesn't the volume of diverse opinions from cats who have reasonable to advanced experience with these instruments in itself say there is synergy in the instruments' materials selection throughout, which ultimately becomes art and magic?
JAUQO III-X said:only Aunt Jemima can answer that.