• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SansAmp BDDI Version 2 and overdrive

Apr 13, 2012
1,754
3,607
Considering getting a SansAmp but wondering about the overdrive. How responsive is it to dynamic playing with a small amount of Overdrive. Can you set it to where you get a nice clean sound playing normal but if you dig in more you start getting saturation?
 
I am mainly a clean player but based on my experience with the original BDDI and the V2 I would say it should work fine. Just remember that the BDDI will be emulating an amp/cab being overdriven. It is not really an overdrive effect pedal itself, its strength (and design goal) is to eliminate needing to mic a cab to feed the bass to a FOH or recording console.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mouthmw and Zbysek
Considering getting a SansAmp but wondering about the overdrive. How responsive is it to dynamic playing with a small amount of Overdrive. Can you set it to where you get a nice clean sound playing normal but if you dig in more you start getting saturation?

It does this very well. It's just a matter of tweeking the Drive and Blend settings to match your playing style.
B.
 
Sorry to resurrect an old thread but I recently purchased a SansAmp and Keeley Bassist and I'm still undecided about their order in the chain. Since the SansAmp is a dynamic pedal, wouldn't putting a comp before it take away from it's responsiveness?

Maybe. You've got a great pairing and it merits a little experimentation. I've seen the comp placed on either side of the BDDI. The big question: what sounds better to your ears in a full-mix environment?

Riis
 
Sorry to resurrect an old thread but I recently purchased a SansAmp and Keeley Bassist and I'm still undecided about their order in the chain. Since the SansAmp is a dynamic pedal, wouldn't putting a comp before it take away from it's responsiveness?
I prefer to have the DI OUT at the end of the chain.

Agree with @Zooberwerx, experiment with it. And if possible try recording it to hear the difference.
 
I prefer to have the DI OUT at the end of the chain.
This is sort of what guides me as well. I use the BDDI as a DI send that is simulating a mic'd amp and cab. Using that mental model I place any other things such as effects (including compression) that would normally be prior to a "real amp and cab" in front of the BDDI.

That said, I completely agree with the recommendation to try both ways and see what you like best. There is no absolute right or wrong here IME.