Pacojas, what are your thoughts on sufficient proof of extraordinary claims? I understand that you believe you saw what you saw, but do you think that's a good enough reason for others to believe it? Whether you care what others think or not, do you think your personal testimony is sufficient evidence of bigfoots existence?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Do you disagree? If you tell me you had a turkey sandwich, it's reasonable to believe you without evidence. If you tell me you saw a member of a telepathic bipedal primate species unknown to the general population living in the Pacific Northwest, can you understand why I don't believe you?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Do you disagree? If you tell me you had a turkey sandwich, it's reasonable to believe you without evidence. If you tell me you saw a member of a telepathic bipedal primate species unknown to the general population living in the Pacific Northwest, can you understand why I don't believe you?