I just stumbled upon this thread yesterday and I finally read the whole thing. Pretty funny stuff here. I would like to say right up front that I really, really, really want Bigfoot to be real. That would be incredible! However, until there is actual empirical evidence that passes scientific scrutiny (publishing, peer review, repeatability, etc) I just cannot believe in this mythical creature.
I'm also waiting for pacojas to actually describe the creature he saw. He was asked directly a couple of times and deflected the question with vague answers he claimed were descriptive. 6'4", tall and thin, youthful looking, looked like other descriptions, etc. None of this is descriptive. I want details! Is the creature hairy? If so how long, what color, where is the hair thickest, hair on the face, hands, ears? Describe the facial features. What color were the eyes, what shape were the eyes, were they in the same location as humans, flat nose, pointed nose, nostril size, lip size and shape, ear shape and size, head shape, sloping forehead or more human-like. What were the body proportions? Long arms, long legs, hand and foot size. How did the creature move? What kind of gait? If I wanted somebody to believe that I saw a mythical creature, and I was convinced I did, I would be as descriptive as possible.
I'm firmly in the camp of those who think this siting was a byproduct of the pot farms pacojas worked at. Just sayin'