TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
THE FIX AND HOW IT WORKS:
That little piece of wood that gets knocked out? It's trash. It's useless. You can toss it. Or glue it in carefully, if you want, but frankly, it's decoration more than function.
What you really need in there is the spacer that would fill the "travel area" and keep the rod from being pulled out of the neck.
On the left is the stock "washer" for the rod, on the right is the spacer. That spacer is actually a piece of a bicycle chain, THE ROLLER. I used to work at a bike shop and snagged a bunch of them from scrap chains to keep as truss rod spacers. They are hardened steel and drastically better than most "washers" because they won't mushroom like this one did under pressure.
I ended up using 2 of those rollers as spacers and they appear to be working fantastically. They fill the gap, the rod tension is borne on those, not the heel of the neck wood, and I can get a mad back-bow in this neck (it still has a wicked front bow naturally, but I'm going to keep torturing it).
This one lives to fight another day.
Okay, so why does that work without an anchor point?
Well, if you've ever had a "golden era" Warwick, you may or may not know that the truss rods in those could be removed without taking the neck apart. They just slid out as a unit. The concept was, once it was seated in place, the truss rod worked fine to add relief by pushing against itself. There was no shoulder or support built into the neck, it was built into the rod.
This is essentially the same design. As you can see, the truss could likely be removed like this without much effort, other than pulling. And the only reason to remove it completely would be if it were snapped, which this one isn't so I'm not going to force the issue.
Point is, if the rod functions, there's no reason to do much more than fill that gap with a nice spacer and make sure the rod is seated as far in the neck as possible.
'Cuda, or anyone else with this issue, the fix can be had with these chain rollers. I'm happy to help anyone out if they need a pair, but you can also go to your local bicycle shop and peruse their scrap chains. I guarantee, if they are anything like my shop used to be, you can bribe them with beer and/or pretzels and they'll hook you up.
So yeah... I think I can put this one to bed at the moment. There are design issues and wood quality issues, but the fix involved is not rocket science and should allow for better performance out of these basses for practically no money and little effort (compared to removing a fingerboard).
Speaking of beer... I deserve one now!



I was thinking that, however in trying to screw them to the neck itself they did bite with 1/4" more in the wood. Is 1.5" the standard length for these? They are only maybe 1/4" into the neck at that length with the body and plate on. I'm thinking I could just get screws that are 1.75".This also had 2.5 stripped holes! Bigger screws would work, but likely stick out from the plate.
May need to plug, then redrill.
thanks, I wonder what the turn is on the screw threads - hardware stores usually have common sizes like 1/4 20 etc....It does appear they are #8 1-1/2" oval head screws, .1665" diameter on the threaded part.
Typically, I see the more common 1-3/4" found on most Fender style basses. They are hard to find in a hardware store though.
I tested the look of a #10 screw in the plate and it does stick out a bit:
View attachment 7189870
But it's .1860" on the threaded part and 1-1/2" are pretty common to find at HD, in stainless, and cheap. So that could be somewhat of an upgrade, if you don't mind the proud part on the plate (or widen the plate hole bevel slightly). Otherwise, yeah, a #8 in a longer thread could also do a similar job.