• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SBO 2022, Big ABG scratch

Thanks. I am hoping that with the large Sitka top, the shape arching, and hole pattern I have in mind to maximize travel, and a concept analogous to your banjozilla spring (appropriated from Banjozilla after reading about it on your website) that I’ve been playing with that will hopefully make it into this design. Given a top action calibrated to resist a given static downward string force, a top this size should be capable of producing some volume. Once there is time to start work I will post pictures of the proof of concept trials.

Another important tip: Make the spring system adjustable in some way. You'll find that the spring rate (in pounds/inch) will be the biggest factor in shaping the overall EQ curve of the instrument. I swapped in different rate springs into Banjozilla, and was surprised how much it changed the sound.

Also, simpler was better. I went through, I think, seven different iterations of the support spring system in Banjozilla. Some of them were quite complicated, like arched maple strips and brass leaf springs. The best sounding combination was a pair of simple steel coil springs.
 
Arched wood is what I was planning.
I used to make bows, so that is right where my brain went when I read about banjozilla’s spring. I have some Osage orange, excellent in compression and tension, black cherry decent at both, better under compression, or maybe I could make a cherry/ ash laminate, or cherry and sinew.
if I build them in a similar manner to the arms of a bow it’s possible to shape and tune the spring arms in the same way a bow is finished. Calculate, overbuild, then trial and error as material is removed. Real world science. Lol.
once the back is on, they will not be adjustable so hopefully they are stable.
 
Regarding the strength of the internal bridge force balancing leaf spring apparatus.
If I can calculate my string tension, and then the downforce based on my bridge height and build the top to withstand the static force without deflection, what percentage of that downforce would be a decent starting point for the spring’s deflection point? I would assume the stronger I make it, the less sustain the top will have.
is there a way to estimate these forces before the trial and error period starts?
@Bruce Johnson do you recall what the percentage of the downforce your spring was?
Banjozilla’s top probably had less contribution than an archtop will, but how much?
There are a few projects that really need to get done before I can start on this (without my wife killing me), but I’m getting twitchy with anticipation.
 
Regarding the strength of the internal bridge force balancing leaf spring apparatus.
If I can calculate my string tension, and then the downforce based on my bridge height and build the top to withstand the static force without deflection, what percentage of that downforce would be a decent starting point for the spring’s deflection point? I would assume the stronger I make it, the less sustain the top will have.
is there a way to estimate these forces before the trial and error period starts?
@Bruce Johnson do you recall what the percentage of the downforce your spring was?
Banjozilla’s top probably had less contribution than an archtop will, but how much?
There are a few projects that really need to get done before I can start on this (without my wife killing me), but I’m getting twitchy with anticipation.

The downforce on the feet of the bridge will depend on the amount of break angle of the strings over the bridge. You can adjust the amount of downforce by adjusting the break angle; adjusting the height of the tailpiece in relation to the bridge.

Whatever amount of downforce you decide put down into the feet, the spring reaction system underneath needs to be adjusted to apply an equal amount of upforce to balance it. If you take the top out of the picture, the bridge should be able to sit there on top of the spring reaction system, with the strings up to tune. The force down pushing against an equal force up; an equal balance of the strings (being springs) against the opposing springs underneath.

At that balance point, the vertical position of the bridge should be right for the string action height over the fingerboard. That's the other reason for needing an easy adjustment of the spring system. If the action is too low, and you raise the height of the bridge saddles, as normal on an electric bass, you'll just compress the springs a little more. And the strings won't raise up. You have to be able to raise up the bottom of the springs, in order to actually raise up the bridge. Banjozilla has a big brass knob on a threaded stud that I can use to crank the spring system up and down.

Note that tightening the knob doesn't change the spring rate (in lbs/in) of the springs. It raises the bottom of the springs, compressing them in height, and increasing the force (lbs.) applied upward. But the spring rate remains the same. You have to change to different springs (unsprung length, wire size, etc.) to change the spring rate.

The spring rate becomes important, because it determines how much the top will deflect when the strings are plucked. When you pluck a string about as hard as you would want to, you would like the bridge (and top and spring system) to bounce up and down about 1/8" from the neutral balanced position. That's the goal, and how much it bounces is determined by the spring rate.

My earlier spring systems in Banjozilla didn't have enough travel; the spring rate was too high. Not enough movement of the head, and the sound volume was weak. I increased the length of the coil springs. That reduced their spring rate. The longer springs had to be compressed farther to reach the pounds of force needed to balance against the string load. But they still had a lower spring rate. That meant that head deflected farther with the same plucking on the strings. A big increase in the sound volume. More travel from the diaphragm.

Those are the mechanics that you need to think about. Your spring reaction system, whether steel or wood, needs to be able to apply enough force upward to balance the download from the strings. The springs also need to have enough travel and a low enough spring rate to allow the top to deflect 1/8" under heavy plucking. And the top has to be able to deflect 1/8" without exploding.
 
237D4C6F-2234-4AE0-B772-BAE71AA62BB6.jpeg
367046A2-2D20-42F4-A950-42019DAFF225.jpeg
9372F05C-C6DA-4D35-A80F-134B0FD3C687.jpeg
Started prepping the top today. the boards needed a bunch of work,
and finally, no light between them.
 
My glue doesn’t look ready and I’m tired.
Better safe than sorry, I’ll heat the glue back up in the morning and put it together tomorrow.

Hey, you could use West Systems Epoxy! :D:D I'm just teasing....You probably know that I'm a dedicated epoxy user, and I've been thoroughly scorned by traditional Luthiers.
 
Modeling the shape. I cut the plywood to the dimensions of my top, everything will be designed around that. I made some sides of cardboard to play with the scale and test the reach and stability. I know this mock-up is silly, and ugly, but it helps me plan and conceptualize.
I think I’ll leave the pattern as big and round as possible to get as many square inches as possible out of the spruce
E477DE6A-33C4-4433-A35F-4ED82E66CB79.jpeg
and this can be my personal Moon Bass
 
There's a very interesting scroll in one of your photos. I may steal this idea for a future build.

Did you cut it?
View attachment 4735501
Yes. that’s the scroll for the matching guitar, viotar, guitarolin thing. It’s a small parlor/ camping guitar built for a violin player. There are some progress shots in the “what’s on your workbench “ thread.
I am considering making the bass scroll similar.