• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Separate EQing

#4
L.A. Moore said:
From what I gatherd he would use 1 15 channel on each instament channel, so 15 for bass drum, the other 15 for bass guitar. He's the only sound man i've ever seen do that. Most around here eq off the board then eq the main mix.
Click to expand...
And that's usually fine for most applications. But some soundmen are married to graphic EQ's because they like having more control over narrower frequency bands rather than a general tone knob set at a fixed frequency.
 
#5
That's a little different, but the general idea isn't unheard of...many engineers carry parametrics for their money channel(s), so maybe this guy was doing the cheap version of it?

I used to carry preamps / parametrics for the critical channels in my tour days. Usually meant the lead vocal and the kick drum for rock. It was a life saver whenever I walked into a lower-quality-than-expected rig (aka rider said Midas, venue supplied Mackie). The Midas XL42 saved my butt a few times.

-Mark
 
#6
Nowadays, I'm working with more soundmen who have all their EQ's and effects on a computer as plug-ins. I'd like to learn more about doing that. Bet you'd have to have a very powerful CPU with a lot of RAM, though.
 
#7
JimmyM said:
Nowadays, I'm working with more soundmen who have all their EQ's and effects on a computer as plug-ins. I'd like to learn more about doing that. Bet you'd have to have a very powerful CPU with a lot of RAM, though.
Click to expand...

Yup, it's available...but I'm the old-fashioned "like to turn a knob" kind of engineer. I don't trust ANY computer that much.

I don't even care for most digital consoles, with the notable exception of Digico. I've toured with those and love them.

I haven't tried the Midas XL8 yet, but from what I've heard I might like it as well. Not likely I'll come across one anytime soon with the $300,000+ price tag, though. :eek:

-Mark
 
#9
David1234 said:
I am still amazed when sound guys EQ the whole mix to get maximum gain-before-feedback from one vocal mic. The logic seems to be "the vocals feed back at 630 Hz therefore I am going to eradicate 630 Hz from vocal, bass, drums, keys, guitars, ...."

Maybe this guy has it right!
Click to expand...

I don't think many sound guys do that. Maybe they do it for the vocal monitors but the front of house is not likely to feedback from vocal mics generally anyway.
 
#11
I'm betting mrokern's thought about parametric EQ is on the right track. It's pretty common for certain instruments to have problems with dead spots or wolf notes in certain rooms, and a regular 3-band or 4-band mixer channel EQ cannot fix those.
 
#12
The engineer might have just been running a graphic EQ for each monitor mix. I know I do it - it's the best way to cut down on feedback, especially if you get a singing drummer who needs his monitors turned up to the point of bleeding ears. I usually throw an outboard para on the lead vocal and kick, but generally speaking, you won't need per-channel outboard EQ if you're running a half-decent board.

Of course, that's assuming the band isn't spewing a terrible sound into your precious PA and you have to EQ the hell out of it just to hear what's going on.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back