• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Seymour Duncan STC-3p

I had the Steve Bailey STC 3 preamp on my six string. It is the same as the normal version but instead of the push / pull control cutting the mids for a slap sound, it boosted them for a middy fretless sound.

Sorry, but as much as I like Seymour Duncan's pickups, that preamp was inferior to just about any other active preamp I've tried. The treble control gave off a load of hiss, and the bass control had a kind of low hiss, like a rumble, if boosted. It also picked up radio interference all the time. I've had experience with Bart NTMB preamps, Fender active preamps, EMG active preamps, the Mike Pope Fodera preamp, and the Musicman active preamp, and the Duncan was by far the noisiest and most annoying of the lot.

That being said, I think they're really designed to work best with the Duncan active soapbars, so maybe with those they're great, but as a standalone active replacement preamp there are better ones out there.
 
I don't see why not...if it's good enough for pro's (Dirk Lance, Sam Rivers, PNUT), it should be a good piece of gear.

I really hate it when people say "if it is good enough for ... then it is good enough for me". If we think about it what that is really saying is that they don't believe that they are capable of arriving at a valid decision on their own which I would encourage you is crap. Sometimes the differences between things are subtle and indeed under certain circumstance undetectable but that just means we need to keep digging.