• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SG & EB Bass Club

Gibson has straight up said they don't have tools to make a mudbucker at the moment. If we are lucky we may see a custom shop reissue down the road. *maybe*

custom shop exists to compete with vintage markets and PRS / MM / Suhr in the absurd price areas. The EB3s from the 60s are hitting $2000-$3000 for good ones so we need another grand of value to justify an EB3 reissue.

Really Gibson needs a custom shop only new Warwick Spector style competitor and some basses even if they are low volume just to get the brand back in the bass world. Own the short scale market or something.

but anyway, SGB is a winner I just want those 2 things dammit.
 
Just for your all's interest a 1969 Mudbucker. The last year of the true ones. Just thought you might like to take a look.
;[)
Bob (from his hospital bed)
20201221_204746~2.jpg
20201221_204825~2.jpg
 
Just for your all's interest a 1969 Mudbucker. The last year of the true ones. Just thought you might like to take a look.
;[)
Bob (from his hospital bed)
View attachment 4098309 View attachment 4098310
Info: The Curtis Novak EB-0 doesn't have that mounting flange.
Also, the Novak EB-0 in the current SG bass requires a little routing.
It does fit in the Epi EB-0 without routing.
 
Last edited:
custom shop exists to compete with vintage markets and PRS / MM / Suhr in the absurd price areas. The EB3s from the 60s are hitting $2000-$3000 for good ones so we need another grand of value to justify an EB3 reissue.

Gibson "re-issues" have failed to impress me so far with very few exceptions. Furthermore, they don't have the wood to make a proper EB-3 reissue, unless it were a VOS or Historic for $10K+ that would justify them using whatever limited stock of old growth Mahagony and Brazilian Rosewood they have left.

If a '60s EB-3 is your thing, just grab one. They are still a bargain compared to most of their counterparts from the same era.

Bob (from his hospital bed)

I hope you feel better soon, my friend. Wishing you all the best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dmt
Gibson "re-issues" have failed to impress me so far with very few exceptions. Furthermore, they don't have the wood to make a proper EB-3 reissue, unless it were a VOS or Historic for $10K+ that would justify them using whatever limited stock of old growth Mahagony and Brazilian Rosewood they have left.

If a '60s EB-3 is your thing, just grab one. They are still a bargain compared to most of their counterparts from the same era.



I hope you feel better soon, my friend. Wishing you all the best.
Likewise.:thumbsup:
 
I need 2 things.

I need a wiring guide for an Epiphone EB-0. I have the pup, 2-200K pots, an orange capacitor and a jack. I just need to know what to solder to what.

I also need a pick guard for the same.

LMK if anyone can help with either.
 
Would love to know how you think the pickup placement changes tone especially difference in the middle vs bridge.

That the bridge is stock amuses me way too much with all the other heavy modding going on.

I needed to shim the pickup cavities to get the pickups close enough to the strings (I routed them too deep in the first place; my bad). That done, I got it wired up last night. Freeway Switch, master volume. The Freeway Switch lets me do neck/both/bridge for each pair of pickups. Plugged it in and noodled a bit. The Model One is, well, warm. Not my favorite tone, but maybe useful for sixties stuff. The Delano is full and crisp (of course!), but for some reason has a bit of buzz; need to check the shield ground on that one. The SGDs have dual coils and neo magnets; they are full and clear, but more mid-focused than the Delano.

The tones change in a predictable way from bridge to neck. Bridge solo is nasal and nigh unusable on its own. Neck solo is full and warm and mushy and doesn't excite me. The middle positions can get into P-bass territory, not surprisingly. Combinations sound semi-modern.

Re the bridge: I'm really just using it because I have it, and because the body already has the bushings. I am in the camp of folk who aren't particularly bothered by the three-point, but this design does eliminate any concerns about the bushings pulling out. It also avoids the "silk on the saddles" phenomenon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nebula24

Latest posts