• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

SG & EB Bass Club

Not really, just turn the volume down on the bridge pick up and you still have your EB-0 sound.
I would never route an instrument if I don't have to. I installed EMG pickups on my PBass and there was no room for the 9v battery so I hadda route out the cavity to make it fit. For my 1st time it came out pretty decent or acceptable. As far as doing so to an EB0 what's the point? I'll just buy an SG special or standard if he want that pickup. No need for all that nonsense work and risk of ruining the bass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53
They moved the neck pickup to that mid position in 1972 I believe. The Varitone (on that one) was taken out of it also and a probably three way switch installed in it's place, that bass has been modded quite a bit.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
Yeah, random pic of an EB-3 taken off the web. But, illustrates the point of the pickup having been moved. Now just need to find a recording of one :D
 
Yeah, random pic of an EB-3 taken off the web. But, illustrates the point of the pickup having been moved. Now just need to find a recording of one :D

The fourth generation EB-0/3 are not a difficult find to test in person, and nowhere near as pricey as their older siblings. I'd rely on that approach much rather than chasing a recording of one.

They are by far my least favourite generation of them all, but tastes differ. I don't know how close you are to Fairfax, but GC over there appears to have one of them in stock.

Happy hunting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tbone76
Anyone try one of these harnesses? They have two different ones, one without the Jack Bruce mod and one with. I just bought one and I'll let you all know how it differs from the stock harness. I bought it because position 3 with both pickups and the neck choked is supposed to be fuller with more bottom, the Jack Bruce mod is a plus for me. I'll have it in a few weeks, the tech had to make a special one for the wide 65 spacing. I kind of like it the way it is but there are situations where I'd like a little more bottom and mids, we'll see.

Gibson EB-3 Harness Jack Bruce Mode Bourns Pots Custom KellingSound | eBay
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: Squittolo
Anyone try one of these harnesses? They have two different ones, one without the Jack Bruce mod and one with. I just bought one and I'll let you all know how it differs from the stock harness. I bought it because position 3 with both pickups and the neck choked is supposed to be fuller with more bottom, the Jack Bruce mod is a plus for me. I'll have it in a few weeks, the tech had to make a special one for the wide 65 spacing. I kind of like it the way it is but there are situations where I'd like a little more bottom and mids, we'll see.

Gibson EB-3 Harness Jack Bruce Mode Bourns Pots Custom KellingSound | eBay
What is the Jack Bruce mod?
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: Squittolo
What is the Jack Bruce mod?

Supposedly he had a diode (or something) put in his EB-3 to get that dirty sound he got, I always thought it was from his cranked Marshalls, but I just got it for the heck of it and maybe it will sound good. I wanted the harness anyway so I figured I'd get the one with the Jack Bruce mod for 10 more bucks, it's set up like the Rickenbacker cap, you pull up on the tone and it goes into the circuit and you can control the amount of distortion with the pot, sounds like it will be cool and I can always put the bass back to stock but it's not like it is a pristine 65 anyway, it's been stripped and had a headstock break many years ago.
 
Supposedly he had a diode (or something) put in his EB-3 to get that dirty sound he got, I always thought it was from his cranked Marshalls, but I just got it for the heck of it and maybe it will sound good. I wanted the harness anyway so I figured I'd get the one with the Jack Bruce mod for 10 more bucks, it's set up like the Rickenbacker cap, you pull up on the tone and it goes into the circuit and you can control the amount of distortion with the pot, sounds like it will be cool and I can always put the bass back to stock but it's not like it is a pristine 65 anyway, it's been stripped and had a headstock break many years ago.
Back in that day I owned a bass Marshall stack and stock EB-3 and spent 100's of hours 'looking' for JB's tone. There was no TB to consult with other like-minded players. Now that I'm getting the info I don't have the need for his tone in any of my current projects, but...I do daydream about a Cream tribute every now and then.
Thanks @bobyoung53 for the info!
 
I would never route an instrument if I don't have to. I installed EMG pickups on my PBass and there was no room for the 9v battery so I hadda route out the cavity to make it fit. For my 1st time it came out pretty decent or acceptable. As far as doing so to an EB0 what's the point? I'll just buy an SG special or standard if he want that pickup. No need for all that nonsense work and risk of ruining the bass.
My thoughts were you can usually find epi EB-O's for dirt cheap used....often under $100. You mentioned earlier you were looking for a epi EB-3....which are harder to find and more expensive. Get a EB-O and then the sky's the limit for what you can add in the bridge position. Filtertron? Jazz bass pick up? Go for it.
 
I have heard they didn't sound much different, never tried one though. That Fly Guitars EB-3 page has a lot of great info on EB-3's.

I've owned several short-scaled and one long-scale piece from this era and would venture a guess that you'd be surprised if you ran any of them head-to-head against your '65. Between the pickup movement, neck wood going from mahagony to maple and the change to the Oil Rig bridge (although the earliest series IV sport a Tilit-O-Matic) it's actually a pretty different instrument IMO. Definitely more polite than the older ones, but somewhat of a "neither fish nor fowl" in my view.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bobyoung53
Supposedly he had a diode (or something) put in his EB-3 to get that dirty sound he got, I always thought it was from his cranked Marshalls, but I just got it for the heck of it and maybe it will sound good. I wanted the harness anyway so I figured I'd get the one with the Jack Bruce mod for 10 more bucks, it's set up like the Rickenbacker cap, you pull up on the tone and it goes into the circuit and you can control the amount of distortion with the pot, sounds like it will be cool and I can always put the bass back to stock but it's not like it is a pristine 65 anyway, it's been stripped and had a headstock break many years ago.
Can somebody provide more details on this pull pot distortion effect? Sounds cool!
 
As an eBay Associate, TalkBass may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
  • Like
Reactions: Ghostinthemach
Very similar to this: Passive Guitar Overdrive (Black Ice)

And this:

2013-02-19095932am_zps99a4bb61.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squittolo
I've done that, both unidirectional (one diode) and bi-directional (one diode in each direction). It's a pretty cool sound. For about fifteen minutes.

It actually reminds me more of McCartney's fuzz bass tone on "Think For Yourself". Neat, but not the sort of tone that's universally useful...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squittolo
I've done that, both unidirectional (one diode) and bi-directional (one diode in each direction). It's a pretty cool sound. For about fifteen minutes.

It actually reminds me more of McCartney's fuzz bass tone on "Think For Yourself". Neat, but not the sort of tone that's universally useful...

Supposedly you can control the distortion with the pot. I don't like a lot of fuzz so if that's what it sounds like I won't use it.
 

Latest posts