I was wondering if playing a short scale is a bad thing? I don't rreally know too many people who play one. What's the disadvantages compared to the advantages?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have an Epiphone Viola bass with flat wounds on it that I play once in a while. It has great tone and is a lot of fun to play becuase it's smaller and MUCH lighter than my Fender Jazz (and cost a lot less, I got mine for $270 new from Guitar Center, the price tag was wrong, shhh...)
Ditto, except change Yamaha to Steinberger for me.I play both short scale and long scale. I don't see any negatives to either. I prefer short scale bacause I have small hands. But I found a Yamaha long scale that is perfect for me.
Action depends on brand, construction etc ie quality, and tone does as well but also includes pickups, electronics etc. Strings are easily avalable through the mail order houses; stock up a bit and you'll have no supply issues.Advantage: easier reach, lighter, smaller in general
Disadvantage: tend to lose some high end tone, not always as easy to find strings, sometimes requires higher action, fretless models require more accuracy to play
I was thinking maybe the Hamer Slammer special Short scale bass (I like cheap, if it works well), or someone just clued me in to the Dean EVO, a sharp looking axe that I would like to try sometime.
I doubt I will ever go to a 5 string, so I plan on sticking with the short scales. Guess it all depends on what you want. YMMV.