Good points Pbass101.
As you've probably gathered,I'm no lawyer,nor am I familiar enough with the facts to go into the finer points of who did what,when etc.
A couple of things that I do know,however,is that Warwick's Stryker bass shares little with the Alembic bass,who more or less copied that off Gibson iirc.
Warwick produce 2 basses who's marketing states that they're built with the full support of the John Entwistle estate.How that "support" is arranged I really dont know,but these 2 models are not what you'd call very profitable lines.Very few Buzzards are sold,globally & it's a similar story with Strykers.So it's really untrue that Warwick profits from them.It's more of a tribute to JE than anything.It's similar with all the signature series of basses Warwick build.The biggest seller would more than likely be the P-Nutt series,& only 50 ad are built of each series.Hardly grounds for accusing Warwick of profiting.I'm not accusing you of that,dont get me wrong.But it's been mentioned a bit so I posted that more or less for the benefit of others who might read this thread.
JE did leave behind alot of debt & I dont blame the beneficiaries of his estate for doing their best to square the books for his creditors.
Anyway mate,it's good to discuss this sorta stuff respectfully with you guys.If I come of as anything other than being friendly & respectfull,please forgive me.I'm an Aussie & kinda type the way I speak & that can sometimes come across os sounding sarcastic,arrogant etc.
Cheers mate,
Greg
As you've probably gathered,I'm no lawyer,nor am I familiar enough with the facts to go into the finer points of who did what,when etc.
A couple of things that I do know,however,is that Warwick's Stryker bass shares little with the Alembic bass,who more or less copied that off Gibson iirc.
Warwick produce 2 basses who's marketing states that they're built with the full support of the John Entwistle estate.How that "support" is arranged I really dont know,but these 2 models are not what you'd call very profitable lines.Very few Buzzards are sold,globally & it's a similar story with Strykers.So it's really untrue that Warwick profits from them.It's more of a tribute to JE than anything.It's similar with all the signature series of basses Warwick build.The biggest seller would more than likely be the P-Nutt series,& only 50 ad are built of each series.Hardly grounds for accusing Warwick of profiting.I'm not accusing you of that,dont get me wrong.But it's been mentioned a bit so I posted that more or less for the benefit of others who might read this thread.
JE did leave behind alot of debt & I dont blame the beneficiaries of his estate for doing their best to square the books for his creditors.
Anyway mate,it's good to discuss this sorta stuff respectfully with you guys.If I come of as anything other than being friendly & respectfull,please forgive me.I'm an Aussie & kinda type the way I speak & that can sometimes come across os sounding sarcastic,arrogant etc.
Cheers mate,
Greg
I don't rag on Warwick owners who are happy with their instruments, but I have a bone to pick with Warwick's ownership. Personally, I'd love to get my hands on an older Jack Bruce Signature Thumb, but that'll never happen either. 



