That's what my USA MTD is. It just happens to be a signature model because it came with the dimensions I wanted.Your own bass with the features that fit your your music, your style and your aesthetic preferences.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That's what my USA MTD is. It just happens to be a signature model because it came with the dimensions I wanted.Your own bass with the features that fit your your music, your style and your aesthetic preferences.
What did you find made it different from other Fender Jazz options other than maybe period correct specs?The only sig bass that ever really tempted me was the Noel Redding Jazz. (Not mentioned in this thread or the older one). The one I played back in 1997 was super nice and sounded good. I already had a Jazz though so buying another didn't make sense to me at the time.
View attachment 7415145
Those kinds of instruments don't really interest me. In my comment, I was talking about the instruments that are specifically different from the other offerings, such as the Reverend Wattplower. Some signatures offer a feature set that is not available elsewhere. Many of these are short- or medium-scale, and I'd collect them all if I could!I do find it interesting that most signature instruments, with few exceptions, were off-the-shelf standard instruments to begin with![]()
![]()
It's been too long so I can't recall. Your assessment of period correct specs sounds about right. I don't remember seeing many sunburst Jazz basses around that time though.What did you find made it different from other Fender Jazz options other than maybe period correct specs?
My comments were not directed at anyone specific, just in general.Those kinds of instruments don't really interest me. In my comment, I was talking about the instruments that are specifically different from the other offerings, such as the Reverend Wattplower. Some signatures offer a feature set that is not available elsewhere. Many of these are short- or medium-scale, and I'd collect them all if I could!
what, an original thought?I've never seen one I want.
I am not going to say no to a Stanley Clarke signature Alembic….
I would love to know which artists made so much money from their signature instruments that they bypassed touring. Please provide some examples.I still think signature instruments are over hyped, and overpriced.
It's like, do I do a tour, or release a signature instrument (and sit on my ass)
I can't imagine any artist did much more with their signature instrument money than maybe go put a down payment on a late model used car. Especially in the bass world. Maybe a guy like John Mayer with his PRS line selling many many thousands was able to go buy another boat, but that's a whole different world.I would love to know which artists made so much money from their signature instruments that they bypassed touring. Please provide some examples.
Leo couldn't play so we're fineI wouldn’t mind any in principle, but I hate the thought of playing an instrument with someone else’s name all over it. I’ll stick with my fenders, I thank you very much. Oh crap, Leo Fender‘s last name is all over these things lol!
To be completely honest, there is a Thunderbird near me that I really like the only thing that stops me from wanting it… is Gene Simmons’ name on it.Does the signature make it better?
I mean, for someone buying the bass, not for Fender or Musicman or Gibson making a few extra hundred dollars by slapping Steve Harris or Joe Dart or Gene Simmons on the headstock?
Yup, I agree, it's unique enough to hold its own. I bought the first Sterling edition (2024 crop) and LOVE it. A finger funk monster!I'm not generally drawn to signature instruments but the sterling joe dart is amazing