OK, I am well aware that the rules prohibit discussion of mod decisions like closing threads and banning, and I don't intend to challenge any decisions that have been made. However, I still feel like I need to ask for some clarification about the principles that guide these decisions so that I can be sure not to violate any rules I'm not aware of.
To wit:
Are silly threads allowed?
A number of threads that I can only call silly or absurd have been closed recently, and I'm trying to figure out what exactly in the Rules/FAQ section they violated. I didn't notice anyone getting flamed or trolled, and unlike some of the "frat boy" business we had a while ago, they weren't hijacking other people's threads and making it impossible to have a straightforward discussion of anything. They seemed pretty self-contained.
I understand it may well be that there were other things going on that I'm not aware of that did violate the stated rules. If so, then so be it. But if it was just that the threads were absurd and the mods have decided not to allow such, please post a statement to that effect so that I (not to mention new members) can be aware of it.
Thanks.
To wit:
Are silly threads allowed?
A number of threads that I can only call silly or absurd have been closed recently, and I'm trying to figure out what exactly in the Rules/FAQ section they violated. I didn't notice anyone getting flamed or trolled, and unlike some of the "frat boy" business we had a while ago, they weren't hijacking other people's threads and making it impossible to have a straightforward discussion of anything. They seemed pretty self-contained.
I understand it may well be that there were other things going on that I'm not aware of that did violate the stated rules. If so, then so be it. But if it was just that the threads were absurd and the mods have decided not to allow such, please post a statement to that effect so that I (not to mention new members) can be aware of it.
Thanks.