The value of a second, young, female, singer, beyond possibly drawing a better crowd and extending the set list into different genres/tastes, is that it also gives your main singer a break, and can really up the background vocal game.
Everyone here seems to be revolving around the question of “well, what if *I* only played 5 songs, what else does she do, blah blah whinge.”
Guys, I think we can do better.
A better question to ask is under what circumstance would you feel ok giving up some pay to have her in the band.
I would avoid some weird laundry list of non musical tasks that would “justify her pay”. That’s just a recipe for ill feelings (unless, of course, she offers to take on promotional tasks, social media, etc.).
36 songs is a really thin song list for a steadily gigging band, but it’s probably an average set list for most 3-4 hour gigs. Right now, she can sing a half hour of that time.
I think you would see a big difference in band performance if she sang a dozen tunes. 18(half the night) would be ideal.
I would just say she’s in an internship until she can sing 12 tunes, working her way to 18. She gets full pay when she can get through a full set. Also, the proud dad had BETTER be working the crowd, tip bucket in hand, when he’s not singing. In the short term, something needs to happen to try to make up for less pay.
Eventually, she’ll be able to sing the whole night, and you can fire dad. It’ll serve him right!
