Well sort of. TBH, the PDNs are only slightly more than standard production model EBMM. Couple hundred bucks in my case. No where near difference between stock Fender and CS.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have owned Stingray, skyline and Lakland USA, in my experience Stingray feels more like the Skyline. IME the USA Lakland felt superior than the SR.
Well sort of. TBH, the PDNs are only slightly more than standard production model EBMM. Couple hundred bucks in my case. No where near difference between stock Fender and CS.
Well everything is subjective, I would place the EBMMs somewhere in between Skylines' and US Laklands". I'll just say it, if my 55-02 was set up and final inspected at the Chicago shop,it must have been 4:30 in the afternoon on a Friday if you catch my drift! Jim
Or maybe you just need it to be setup again.![]()
I'm sure the OP comparison is being made between a regular EBMM and a Skyline 44-02 at the given price point. Throwing in limited run models as a comparison is like saying 'my $$$$ CS Fender feels boutique'. Well i would expect it to at the price.
EBMMs are fantastic production basses, but so are the Skylines.
it is still a separate line that is... greater care.
Just curious Jim, if it was a lemon why didn't you send it back? That wasn't the case with my Skyline... It was flawless. I was really impressed and this was after already having a 55-94 in my possession. I would agree that the neck texture between the US Lakie and Skyline are very different.
That being said, i don't think it is fair using a lemon as a comparison. EBMM has lemons too and i wouldn't use it as any indication of quality compared with what they usually produce.
Can you cite a source to support that statement? I would be surprised if EBMM would state that PDN instruments are built or setup with greater care than their regular instruments. I thought PDN just meant a limited release color, only available through certain dealers.
I should have but after all my complaints about the construction it does have a great sound, one of the best B strings I've played due to the 35" scale and for the first couple of months tried to ignore its flaws. Look, I don't want to come across as bashing Skylines, they are after all a cheaper version of the US models and I wouldn't expect them to have the same quality as a $3500.00 bass. But priced at $1500.00 I think there are better basses out there,built in the US. Peace out, Jim
That's cool. If you still own the bass, I strongly suggest reaching out to Lakland about the issues. Their customer service is outstanding.I should have but after all my complaints about the construction it does have a great sound, one of the best B strings I've played due to the 35" scale and for the first couple of months tried to ignore its flaws. Look, I don't want to come across as bashing Skylines, they are after all a cheaper version of the US models and I wouldn't expect them to have the same quality as a $3500.00 bass. But priced at $1500.00 I think there are better basses out there,built in the US. Peace out, Jim
Have you had an opportunity to play a Lakland? Do you have one? If yes, give it a go. In the case you like it more then you could be saving some money.
But to be honest what you have been describing in my head sounds like a HH Musicman. Stingray or Sterling is quite subjective.
From my personal experience and my personl needs, I think the most ideal bass would be a HH Sterling. The stingray is nice, but the body and the neck on the sterling make a lot more attractive to me.
Don't get me wrong I liked the Lakland a lot and I thought it was a lot more reasonably priced, but it sounded a bit too polite for my taste, my favourite pickup combination was the 50-50 with the outer coil of the humbucker selected, essentially a j-bass configuration. Moreover, really limited color options (Superficial, I know). On the other hand the neck was great, the body was very managable and balanced well. And at that price point nothing came even close.
Ok something came, but I will not throw a third option at you...
more scrutiny and greater care that the finish along with the rest of the bells & whistles(roasted necks, etc.) turning out right.
I don't think it is unreasonable to assume that since that is what the extra bucks are for.
Again, I would be surprised if EBMM would state that they give more scrutiny or greater care to the PDN instruments than the other instruments they make. I would bet that they go through the exact same production process as their other instruments, just with whatever different finish/options they are getting.
And if there is an extra charge (beyond the normal price for a comparable finish, neck wood, or whatever makes the PDN instrument unique), I'd guess the reason for it is "because they can." Some people will happily pay more for something just because it has an air of exclusivity about it. We all know that, and EBMM knows it, too.
But, of course, I could be totally wrong.
That's cool. If you still own the bass, I strongly suggest reaching out to Lakland about the issues. Their customer service is outstanding.
As I can see, those peaople here are discussing this topic without even trying Lakland. Unbeleavable.Ive experienced the opposite (HS) where the additional pickup was worthless. Having options is nice but if they dont function well..then why bother.
Laklands are "fatter" and "fenderish" to me whereas EB's tends to be more aggressive. If I had to pick Id go with Lakland as I found every EB Ive owned pretty one dimensional. (Standard, HS, Classic)
Oh...buy used..you may find you can buy one of each for a few coins more then one "new". Sell the one that doesnt fit you.
Zombie Thread Alert!As I can see, those peaople here are discussing this topic without even trying Lakland. Unbeleavable.