TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
To be fair, the different headbasket design between the two mics yields different results up top, so it's not purely an aesthetic difference. In more practical terms the area where the two mics differ is up higher than most would find terribly usable in a mix situation so it boils down to very little, if not nothing.It's kind of funny that you can put wine in a different bottle and fool the wine experts.
Both are less than ideal for bass...
Don't get too hung up on this. A 57 or 58 are both perfectly usable for bass. They roll off pretty quickly down low so you'll potentially gain some benefit by blending in a low passed DI to fill things out, but that's not a reason to avoid using them.What would you recommend?
What would you recommend?
Most sound techs who mic also DI, so might as well make the most out of it, though I would rather use one of those other mics you named. Still, if you don't have one of them and want to be cost effective and have the channels to do it, a 58 + a DI is a great way to go.HD421 or RE20. Yes, they are expensive. Yes, a 57 or 58 can work with DI, but that defeats the purpose.
Most sound techs who mic also DI, so might as well make the most out of it, though I would rather use one of those other mics you named. Still, if you don't have one of them and want to be cost effective and have the channels to do it, a 58 + a DI is a great way to go.
I don't even bother asking for dual channels. Never did. And I agree that it doesn't happen every day. But if a sound tech sets up a mic for you, chances are they also set up a DI. Also, if you're using your own PA, I imagine you can give yourself as many channels as you want, unless you're using a very small board.Maybe at larger venues. At most smaller clubs, you'd be lucky to get a mic at all. Even if you do, the chances of getting two channels are next to zero.
Given your well-documented and frustrated switch to DI, I'm a bit surprised to hear your successfully getting dual channels.
An RE20 is an incredibly natural-sounding mic with a clear & wide low-end. It's a true standard for broadcasting for that reason. However, it's also incredibly sensitive and personally, I'm a little afraid of it for live use with a bass cab, having tried it for that a lot at one time. I once soloed the bass mic channel and listened to a whole low-volume conversation way across the stage. Use it for bass with that caution. You might end up with the whole mix in your channel, especially if it's anywhere near the monitors!HD421 or RE20. Yes, they are expensive. Yes, a 57 or 58 can work with DI, but that defeats the purpose.
An RE20 is an incredibly natural-sounding mic with a clear & wide low-end. It's a true standard for broadcasting for that reason. However, it's also incredibly sensitive and personally, I'm a little afraid of it for live use with a bass cab, having tried it for that a lot at one time. I once soloed the bass mic channel and listened to a whole low-volume conversation way across the stage. Use it for bass with that caution. You might end up with the whole mix in your channel, especially if it's anywhere near the monitors!
HD421 or RE20. Yes, they are expensive. Yes, a 57 or 58 can work with DI, but that defeats the purpose.
Both are less than ideal for bass...
Actually, the 57 sounds great on a bass cab, especially combined with a DI signal (which is what most will use anyway.
I know a sound guy who swears by his 57's and use them on almost everything, even low freq stuff like bass and sometimes kick drums.