Big +1 to what MysticMichael said. Having owned both I really really concur with the tonal descriptions he gave.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'll chime in. The answer is, it depends.
Bear in mind first of all that the DiMarzios are a heckuva deal, and probably underpriced - relative to the competition.
For only $100 more, I would say that the Delanos are most definitely not overpriced - relative to the value you get. They're super - but not necessarily everyone's cup o' tea.
The Model J has a relatively more subdued upper midrange & high frequency response, that can be opened up somewhat - as JoelB stated - by using a 500k tone and/or volume pot. Still, its main strength is in the lows and the lower mids. It sounds thick. And when played in a high-gain situation, it snarls & growls very nicely.
The JMVC is hotter & brighter, IMHO. It also has a relatively more open, more extended upper midrange & high-frequency response. But the mids & lows are also very present - and very powerful.
The JMVC has excellent attack characteristics. If slapping/tapping is in your bag o' tricks to any significant extent, the JMVC will thrill you. Think of the JMVC as more modern, the Model J more vintage. But both will knock your socks off, given the right playing environment (i.e. instrument, rig, settings, technique, etc.).
Hope that helps...
MM
Well....
I'm not sure I can answer that.
I suppose it is relative to you specific situation.
I put the these DiMarzios on that '74 Jazz in 1979.
I just put the Delano in the Tele.
I have not had a lot of time with it, but it does seem to sound
a tad more "snarly"/"burpy"/"Jaco-like" straight-up than the DiMarzios, but then again I have the '74 set up with phase &
coil tap switches, so I can get a lot of different sounds with
them....
I suppose I was wanting to have different basses with different (quality) pups, so they would all sound different.
However I DO LOVE the DiMarzios!, and have for 33 years...
I'll chime in. The answer is, it depends.
Bear in mind first of all that the DiMarzios are a heckuva deal, and probably underpriced - relative to the competition.
For only $100 more, I would say that the Delanos are most definitely not overpriced - relative to the value you get. They're super - but not necessarily everyone's cup o' tea.
The Model J has a relatively more subdued upper midrange & high frequency response, that can be opened up somewhat - as JoelB stated - by using a 500k tone and/or volume pot. Still, its main strength is in the lows and the lower mids. It sounds thick. And when played in a high-gain situation, it snarls & growls very nicely. It's an uncouth beast of a pickup.
The JMVC is hotter & brighter, IMHO. It also has a relatively more open, more extended upper midrange & high-frequency response. But the mids & lows are also very present - and very powerful.
The JMVC has excellent attack characteristics. If slapping/tapping is in your bag o' tricks to any significant extent, the JMVC will thrill you. Think of the JMVC as more modern, the Model J more vintage. But both will knock your socks off, given the right playing environment (i.e. instrument, rig, settings, technique, etc.).
Hope that helps...
MM
Good data!
Now, here's a tough one: if you have a 5 string what's your best bet since the Model J only appears to come in a 4 string model?


I guess the definition of "worth it" would be you bought it, installed it, and when you heard it said to yourself "could I have gotten this sound for less money?" Of course ever pickup is different, but do you feel like what you are getting out of the Delano is worth what you paid?
I have an additional question. Are the Model J's noise cancelling?