But that's an argument for private ownership, not public ownership! It's fairly well established that publicly-traded companies face much greater pressure from their boards to show ever-greater short-term profit, sometimes at the expense of long-term growth. Private companies do not necessarily face this same pressure, which is one of the benefits to taking a company private in many cases.Holdsg, in his reply to my earlier comment, conceded this point (like the gentleman/scholar that is his.) Tbh I think anyone paying attention to this problem at the financial level has to come to the same logical conclusion that you have.
GC would have had no problems sustaining modest growth, with the level of debt, and overall company value they had pre-Bain buyout.
I really don't follow your logic here. "Big finance" isn't any more or less greedy than the shareholders were back when GC was publicly-traded. Remember, the shareholders voted to accept the buyout in the first place, and they pocketed a nice premium when doing so.Really a shame when you break it down. Big finance tries to take a piece of our industry, gets greedy, and potentially causes a collapse.
The market forces that have forced this industry to change so dramatically over the last decade have little to do with Guitar Center's ownership and much more to do with Internet sales and an infusion of cheap imports. Trying to pin the blame for the downturn in the music instrument industry on Bain is far-fetched indeed.