• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Some PA questions from a newb. EV content.

I'll probably never have the opportunity to hear the competing systems in the same room. But I will say I've heard tremendous sound difference just by moving the sub a few feet or making EQ adjustments.

I'm just the "hobby bass player that cares about the overall sound so I do the sound, too" guy. It's all been a learning experience. I hated the mackie sub until we got mixers with HPF. Now I dig it. I'm only recently really starting to like our total sound, stage and FOH. The bass needs some mid boost because the PA stuff doesn't have the built in humps most bass cabs have.

Lately I've been placing my rig behind the drummer and me, barely turned up, with some bass in the monitors. It really fills up the stage without being loud. I dig what you're saying about not loud, but feelable. I've been saying that to the church sound guy for years.

We're more alike than different, that's for sure. I'm a bass player providing sound for my bands because I want us to sound good,too. I went from playing in clubs that always had their own sound to an area where it's all DIY. Hiring a sound guy is about $250 for someone who stands at the board the whole time and actually listens and makes adjustments. DJ's draw bigger crowds than bands around here and It's obvious that sound quality and consistency are major factors.

I'm also looking into a presonus mixer and from what I understand , it's now the easiest it's ever been to have great sound with these mixers because of the presets that are provided for different mic applications. The 16.0.2 is about a grand. Lol ! No racks to bring or nothing.
 
There is some really great info here, thank you all. Enough to make my head hurt. :) I too am merely a hobbyist bass player who happens to care what the band sounds like, and by default I'm now in charge of it all. I just want to make us sound as good as possible on my fairly limited budget.

I'm very interested to hear more input on mixers as well. I thought I was doing good with the mixwiz, but it seems maybe there could be a better solution? I want simple and easy to use, as my knowledge is nill when it comes to actually running a board. Is a digital board really worth the cash for a bar band? Any input on what you guys have gotten good results with in a similar situation are appreciated.
 
Late in the game here, but I owned a pair of ev 15p's for tops and 18p's for subs. I got a big discount, so thought i'd give them a try.
After a month of gigging and tweaking, It just sounded flabby to me. The subs were loose and undefined, and chuffed a lot. Tops were better, nice clarity but again not very punchy.
I ended up selling the rig-
I installed them in a bar as a dj system, they served much better for program music. This was a year ago, they're still cranking away 4 nights a week without issue, i'll give them that.
I bought a pair of QSC K12's for tops and love them. I'm still looking for the right sound/ power to weight ratio in subs, most recently using some jbl passive 18's and a crown amp.
Mix wiz 3 is a great inexpensive desk, but you do need outboard eq and ideally some dynamics (comps and gates) to get the most out of your rig. There are some really awesome digital solutions out there that offer a lot of processing in very small packages, especially the tablet controlled versions but you still need to know the basics of gain staging and signal flow regardless. Sometimes that's a bit easier to learn when you have everything laid out in front of you physically as opposed to virtual layers of control pages- only you know how comfortable you are with that.
 
You spec'ed a Mix Wiz, right? Low cut filters on that board are in the 80 Hz to 100 Hz range. Your crossover frequency for the EV set up is probably right around 100 HZ. Generally, low cut filters are used on everything except kick, bass, keys, between set music and maybe floor tom. So those will make up most, if not all, of what the sub(s) see. Even then, it's only the very lowest end of the range for those instruments.

Big + 1

engaging the Low cut filters will remove excess unnecessary low frequency energy that sucks power , makes the speakers move to much , and just muddies things up .. !! I played mostly keys/bass/sang ... while running sound on stage ... from small to medium systems .. I wanted my bass to sound as close as possible coming out of the mains as it did on stage ... that is hard to do .. !! trial/error .. same with the keys ... of course some onstage amps don't direct all the frequencies out or ' throw' sound as far as PA speakers ...
 
I'm very interested to hear more input on mixers as well. I thought I was doing good with the mixwiz, but it seems maybe there could be a better solution? I want simple and easy to use, as my knowledge is nill when it comes to actually running a board. Is a digital board really worth the cash for a bar band? Any input on what you guys have gotten good results with in a similar situation are appreciated.

Nothing wrong with the mixwiz. It's got enough knobs and buttons to keep a newbie busy for a while.:)

Like DARK, said, you'll want at least some EQ, especially for the monitors to help with feedback. Some type of compression is nice, even if only on the whole mix, but comp for each channel is better. To add these you need cables and the rack starts to grow.

That's where the digitals start to look attractive. I'm most familiar with the dl1608 but also the presonus 24. Both give you compression, gate, 4 band para EQ, variable HPF, reverb and delay for each channel. Imagine the size of the rack and the cost for adding that to the mixwiz.

I'm assuming you're going used since the mixwiz4 is out now at $1000 advertized price. So, yeah, you can save some money and make it work with just a used 3.

The last "normal" mixer we used was a mackie 1604 that was used around $400 or so (can't remember). Added a rack case for another $75 used. DOD dual band graphic EQ ($50 used), Alesis nanoverb and 3630 comp (somebody already had these but figure another $100 used. Mixwiz has FX already). Probably another $50 in cables to hook it up. So $675. That's about as cheap as you can go for 16 channels. The thing was bulky and heavy. Almost as heavy as the sub.

Replaced with the dl1608. $850 new from MF. I already had an ipad. I was going to use my wife's but it became apparent I needed one dedicated for the task. Got a used ipad2 for about $300. So twice as much as the used gear and about the same as a new mixwiz4.

But it has all the utility previously mentioned. The real beauty is that it fits in a laptop bag and weighs 8lbs. Add a $50 router and you can remote mix from any tablet/smartphone. Play a room, get the mix right, save it, then recall it next time you play. We've got saved settings for solo, duo, trio, 4, 5 and full group at various locations.

Sorry for the long diatribe. I probably sound like a salesman. I don't get a cut.:D It just made gigging more enjoyable.

One more note in general. Typical "buddy bands" don't control volume. They're almost always too loud. Any party band should be able to play an average bar with one sub and a pair of 12s. Start out low volume. Your audience will appreciate it. It has the added benefit of being easier to mix and get a good sound. Put the vocals out front, then drums, then bass, then everything else.:bassist::bassist::bassist:
 
Not too long a diatribe, I appreciate the input. Now I'm thinking digital might be the way to go. :) I don't want a rack full of gear to go with the mixer, the less stuff the better as far as I'm concerned. Easy schlepping is always a plus.

Yes the mixwiz3 I got used for right asking $500, I had not even considered any outboard components, mostly because I have no idea what I would even need.

However, considering the cost of the used mixwiz3 plus components, for a few hundred more I can have a new presonus studiolive 16.0.2.
Looks like I have more research to do.

Any input on the presonus would be greatly appeciated.
 
Not too long a diatribe, I appreciate the input. Now I'm thinking digital might be the way to go. :) I don't want a rack full of gear to go with the mixer, the less stuff the better as far as I'm concerned. Easy schlepping is always a plus.

Yes the mixwiz3 I got used for right asking $500, I had not even considered any outboard components, mostly because I have no idea what I would even need.

However, considering the cost of the used mixwiz3 plus components, for a few hundred more I can have a new presonus studiolive 16.0.2.
Looks like I have more research to do.

Any input on the presonus would be greatly appeciated.

The 16.0.2 is a great little mixer. The only downside might be the fact that it doesn't have graphic EQs on the monitor sends. You can use the Fat Channel EQ to EQ the monitors and that might be all you need.
 
One thing I recommend if getting a digital mixer (based especially on my experience with presonus) is to get a battery backup/ regulated power supply. I've had those little boards wig out on me a few times in situations with brown power (crappy bar or when catering at an event plugs a fridge or two or the ice machine into the same circuit without you knowing, for
example). That's the extreme of course, but i've been through it a few times now.
 
Presonus was pretty much the ground breaker in affordable amateur level digital consoles, and while I'm not suggesting that there is really anything wrong with current Presonus models there are lots of choices in the entry level small format digital mixer arena nowadays, many that have favorable attributes compared to Presonus IMO.

The "Qu" Allen and Heath is a whole lot of console for the price point, and I think the newly released Qu24 is a particularly sweet piece for under $3K USD.

However...
Pound for pound it's pretty hard to beat the Behringer X32, and the X32 "Producer" is a full function X32 in a rack mountable size, pretty convenient for weekend warriors remote mixing with an iPad.
 
Beware: More diatribe.:o

If these digital things like mixers & driveracks do the crossover... do you use those or the powered PA speakers crossover?

How about with passive subs? Which one do you use?

My understanding is the latest mackie update put variable HPF and LPF on the main and aux mixes so they could be used as crossovers with dedicated aux to the sub, which would be nice. So far I've been using the built in crossover/HPF/LPF on the subs/speakers.

Presonus was pretty much the ground breaker in affordable amateur level digital consoles, and while I'm not suggesting that there is really anything wrong with current Presonus models there are lots of choices in the entry level small format digital mixer arena nowadays, many that have favorable attributes compared to Presonus IMO.

The "Qu" Allen and Heath is a whole lot of console for the price point, and I think the newly released Qu24 is a particularly sweet piece for under $3K USD.

However...
Pound for pound it's pretty hard to beat the Behringer X32, and the X32 "Producer" is a full function X32 in a rack mountable size, pretty convenient for weekend warriors remote mixing with an iPad.

The Qu16 is at $2k and the x32 is $2800 so they should be much nicer.

As far as I know the dl1608 and the presonus 16.0.2 are the only digitals in the $1k range. Just before the new 16.4.2 AI's came out I was seeing some closeouts on the old model for around $1300, which was a nice deal.

Some points on the dl/16.0.2 comparison:

The mackie has 16 xlr inputs. The PS has 12. Three of the "channels" are stereo. I hate it when mixers say this. IMO if it doesn't have it's own fader it shouldn't be called a channel.

The PS will let you wireless mix from a tablet, but to do so you have to have it hooked to a computer. So one more piece of equipment.

The PS will let you capture a multitrack recording, so that's a nice feature that will let you record a live show with each channel going to a separate track which can later be edited and mixed. But again, it must be hooked to a computer.

The mackie will record the main mix only, two track. It does so direct to the ipad. The bad thing is you can't monitor the recording, see the levels or even play it back until you download to computer. So it could totally suck and you wouldn't know it til you got home. I got around this by downloading a free tascam recording app and have gotten some decent recordings.

The mackie lets you play songs from the itunes on the ipad and has an additional dedicated channel for that. Nice feature for in between sets.
 
The 16.0.2 is a great little mixer. The only downside might be the fact that it doesn't have graphic EQs on the monitor sends. You can use the Fat Channel EQ to EQ the monitors and that might be all you need.

So you're saying the eq is adequate for mains but the monitor mix doesn't have it correct? I would think the fat channel should be ok for monitors. But again I have no idea. Lol. I just want to be sure if I'm spending a grand on a board that I don't need any outboard stuff, otherwise I will need to look into something else.

I'm already way past what I ever intended to spend on a pa. :)So the 2-3k mixers are simply out of the question. If I already had an iPad I would for sure be looking hard at the Mackie, but at $900+ the cost of an iPad to run it its a bit over budget too. The presonus 16.0.2 is as high as I want to go price wise.
 
... I'm already way past what I ever intended to spend on a pa. :)So the 2-3k mixers are simply out of the question. If I already had an iPad I would for sure be looking hard at the Mackie, but at $900+ the cost of an iPad to run it its a bit over budget too. The presonus 16.0.2 is as high as I want to go price wise.

If you're in no big hurry, other options similar to the Mackie DL are coming.......eventually. The QSC Touchmix will have a built in screen and a street price of about $1300, to be released, "mid 2014". The Behringer X18 is scheduled for a bit later in the year with a street price around $800. Behringer is planning to offer Android and PC control in addition to iPad. Google these units for more info. And don't forget, the Mackie has already gone through some growing pains that I expect any new competitors to experience once they get to market. One other option for you to check out availalble today is the Behringer x32 Rack, priced around $1200.

If at all possible, I suggest you go digital from the start. Otherwise you're buying buggy whips. Spend once and be done (like that ever happens on TB!!).
 
So you're saying the eq is adequate for mains but the monitor mix doesn't have it correct? I would think the fat channel should be ok for monitors. But again I have no idea. Lol. I just want to be sure if I'm spending a grand on a board that I don't need any outboard stuff, otherwise I will need to look into something else.

I'm already way past what I ever intended to spend on a pa. :)So the 2-3k mixers are simply out of the question. If I already had an iPad I would for sure be looking hard at the Mackie, but at $900+ the cost of an iPad to run it its a bit over budget too. The presonus 16.0.2 is as high as I want to go price wise.

I don't even use the main 31 band graphic EQs that are built into the mixer. As far as monitors go My band uses IEMs so there is no need for GEQs on the auxes.
 
If you're in no big hurry, other options similar to the Mackie DL are coming.......eventually. The QSC Touchmix will have a built in screen and a street price of about $1300, to be released, "mid 2014". The Behringer X18 is scheduled for a bit later in the year with a street price around $800. Behringer is planning to offer Android and PC control in addition to iPad. Google these units for more info. And don't forget, the Mackie has already gone through some growing pains that I expect any new competitors to experience once they get to market. One other option for you to check out availalble today is the Behringer x32 Rack, priced around $1200.

If at all possible, I suggest you go digital from the start. Otherwise you're buying buggy whips. Spend once and be done (like that ever happens on TB!!).


Thank you for the input and options. I like the idea of being able to use a tablet, I do have a couple android tablets so no added cost there. I will look into everything you mentioned.

And yes I'm leaning more towards digital now, I would love to buy one piece of gear that can hang around for a few years. TB is bad in that regard, seeing how I've had half a dozen bass rigs in the last year. :)






I don't even use the main 31 band graphic EQs that are built into the mixer. As far as monitors go My band uses IEMs so there is no need for GEQs on the auxes.

So are you saying just the fat channel stuff does a good job of eq'ing? I would love to go to iem's but that's another huge cost that just isn't gonna happen right now.