I'm itching to purchase either the Ian Hill or Doug Wimbish Euro Signature but have not had an opportunity to play either. I'm curious as to how the necks compare on the two. I understand that the Ian Hill is 1.64" at the nut and the Wimbish is 1.5" at the nut. Both basses, however, are described by Spector as having a "thin" neck. Is Spector referring to the neck profile/depth? That is, do they both share a shallow soft C shape (compared to the standard Euro) with the only difference being the nut width? Or is Spector referring to the neck width of both basses vs. a standard Euro? I figured the Club would be able to clarify. I'm interested in the overall-smaller neck.
Sorry for any confusion here.
Some vocabulary definitions: When developing Spector's website I came across the same sort of confusing terminology and so I worked with Stuart and PJ to develop the following:
Neck Width: refers to the fingerboard width at the nut. Typical Spector 4-string Neck Width is 1.63-1.65... there are some variations because everything Euro/USA is set by hand. There should be less variation on the Asian import guitars.
Neck Thickness: refers to the front-to-back thickness of the neck. Originally I'd measure the necks in the center of the space between two frets, on the 2nd and 12th fret. Recently I've gone to measuring the entire neck, fret-by-fret.
THE DOUG WIMBISH SIGNATURE MODEL: Doug's original "Honey" bass (as he calls it) is a 1.5" narrow-width (or jazz width) neck which is ALSO thinner front-to-back than the typical Spector.
The Doug Wimbish Signature Model does have a thicker neck (front-to-back) than Doug's original because of the addition of carbon-fiber support rods. Doug's original doesn't have these.
You might notice that in most photos you see of Doug and his "Honey", there's no truss rod cover. That's because the neck on Doug's bass moves. A lot. Doug is fine with that. It's no different than any other vintage jazz bass so he's used to it.
But because the average Spector owner isn't going to want to adjust their truss rod every time they play it, the Doug Wimbish Signature Model has a thicker neck neck with the support rods for this reason.
*You can order a USA NS-2 Doug Wimbish without the support rods, but you'll be highly discouraged not to. Stuart is about stability and playability with his instruments.
THE IAN HILL SIGNATURE BASS: Is actually a slightly thinner than standard Kramer neck. It's thin front-to-back. In all of the measuring I've done of Spectors, time and time again the Kramer necks come up the thinnest front-to-back. This is why the Kramer NS-2 models and NS-2A models are so popular with many bassists.
They have the standard width of 1.63-1.65" at the nut, but because they were made for a lot of hard-rock and metal players (which was Kramer's focus) the necks were designed to be faster.
The Ian Hill model was a way for Spector to offer this popular, thinner neck profile in a classic gloss black (the most popular Kramer finish) finish.
___________________________
If you want to see how your bass compares with a current/typical NS-2 neck I've attached the measurements for The Black Pearl's neck.
