TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Oh yeah!! Nice. What's up with that bridge? What model is that?
I have 2 NS-JH5's. In the early years they used Hipshot B style bridges. I personally prefer them to the standard Spector bridges to be totally honest.this is an NS6JH. #021. Factory bridge as far as I know.
My bad. I mean look, I only need one 6 string unlined fretless in my life I've learned. My gravitation to multiscale necks and my love for my dingwall does have me selling this…. But it just sounds and plays sooooo damn good I've even been considering selling the dingwall in its stead as this thing is just so damn good.Quit torturing me with this beautiful creature.
...you continue to suck...… hmmm. How's that for torture. Mwahahahah.
Sure. Why not. If possible try the bass and if the bass itself works for you then mod away.Curious:
Lets say, hypethetically you could order an NS-2 with an 11 month lead and a reasonable price.
And alternatively, you can find an in-stock NS-2 with a similar price that you would want to change a couple things on... EMG X to EMG P/J, add hipshot tuners/bassextender.
Is it reasonable to just buy the "in-stock" option and mod it? (or wait 11 months for them to build your exact spec bass)
I hope I Get a nice tax refund.Sure. Why not. If possible try the bass and if the bass itself works for you then mod away.
I have the P5X and 40DC with the 18V Haz in my NS2000/5 and the regular EMG P/J set and K-Haz in my NS2A, so I can't really speak to the J comparison. As far as the P's go I think the PX sounds more like a traditional passive P tone when soloed. The non-X sounds a little bit more processed. Both sound great in combination with the bridge pup and give you that Spector growl.Anyone else here experimented with both the EMGX PX/JX series AND the EMG P/J set. Either would be using Hazlab preamp. Just curious to hear anyone's feedback... those who have tried them and if they can do everything the EMG P/J can or not. Gotta have that growl
I have a euro that came with P/J set and an SNC-Pre. I have installed X series since. Agree with the above. The originals are a bit more compressed sounding. Both very articulate. X series have a bit more dynamic response to them. Both growl, both great pickups. Difference wasn't tremendous. But I won't be switching back. I like the X series a lot.Anyone else here experimented with both the EMGX PX/JX series AND the EMG P/J set. Either would be using Hazlab preamp. Just curious to hear anyone's feedback... those who have tried them and if they can do everything the EMG P/J can or not. Gotta have that growl
Anyone else here experimented with both the EMGX PX/JX series AND the EMG P/J set. Either would be using Hazlab preamp. Just curious to hear anyone's feedback... those who have tried them and if they can do everything the EMG P/J can or not. Gotta have that growl
Anyone else here experimented with both the EMGX PX/JX series AND the EMG P/J set. Either would be using Hazlab preamp. Just curious to hear anyone's feedback... those who have tried them and if they can do everything the EMG P/J can or not. Gotta have that growl
Unless you know you need the X series, I'd recommend trying the regular "original recipe" non-X first if that's what it comes with. Every time I've tried them, I always go back to the non-X version - I just like the sound and feel of those better. I'll always try anything new, but I definitely prefer the original recipe.
Anyone else here experimented with both the EMGX PX/JX series AND the EMG P/J set. Either would be using Hazlab preamp. Just curious to hear anyone's feedback... those who have tried them and if they can do everything the EMG P/J can or not. Gotta have that growl
Came across a 1990 blue Kramer on Reverb, this morning, and couldn't resist. I'll post more pictures when I get it.
View attachment 4894874
View attachment 4894875
View attachment 4894876
View attachment 4894877
That's one way to look at it. Thanks, Gary.Early Merry Christmas to you, Jack