Their fixed bridge guitars are just fine, but once you get the vibrato bridges involved, it's a crap-shoot.
remember folks, it's SquiER:
remember folks, it's SquiER:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
This is the most significant part. A new Squier bass can (and I have seen several first hand examples) be as good or better than a vintage Fender, one for one in terms of build quality & fitment of the wood, and the functional hardware (specifically tuners, but all of Fender's newer bridges are marginally better than all of Fender's older bridges, specialty versions excluded). It's more dependent on the Fender though, there are some very bad instruments out there, and some amazing ones, while the Squiers tend to be a bit more consistent.My theory is that modern manufacturing techniques are so good, that entry-level gear made by a major company is going to be really, really good.
This is the most significant part. A new Squier bass can (and I have seen several first hand examples) be as good or better than a vintage Fender, one for one in terms of build quality & fitment of the wood, and the functional hardware (specifically tuners, but all of Fender's newer bridges are marginally better than all of Fender's older bridges, specialty versions excluded). It's more dependent on the Fender though, there are some very bad instruments out there, and some amazing ones, while the Squiers tend to be a bit more consistent.
I haven't found a Squier bass that interests me enough to buy one, but I do own a CV Tele that gets played once a year or so when I feel like picking up a guitar, but it's not as nice as my Schecter whatever-it-is. Both are hard tail; I think the trem is a lot of what can make an otherwise good guitar bad. Worse with Squiers than Fenders, but even still the higher level Fenders get it better.
However, none of this changes the fact that Squier are still entry level instruments and a little more money gets you a lot better instrument, even if it's not made by Fender. With the option to play it, I'd suggest a used Fender will still be a better value than a new Squier all else equal. Without the ability to play it, there are a lot of other manufacturers out there making a better instrument than a Squier.
Squier's guitars are equally as good as their basses. You need to remember that guitarists are FAR more elitist than bassists. This is why most guitar innovations take off on the bass side long before they succeed with guitar players.
Even on the older 80’s/90’s MIK Squiers, the ones that put the bad taste in consumers mouths in the first place, for the most part have AMAZING necks! The old MIK bullets (with the big BULLET on the headstock ball) are often sought after just to use the neck for a build. When you can get one for ~$50 though, why not?! And the late 80’s early MIK ones (w/silver logo) really are fantastic all around, from the experience I’ve had owning/flipping a few.To address the guitar side- Squier makes great guitars these days. I recently bought a Squier Contemporary HH tele. Terrific instrument. I also have a MIM HH tele, and an Am. Strat. I loved an Affinity Tele maple neck I tried at GC so much I bought a neck to use as a model for a guitar I'm building myself.
My $0.02 are the people who turn their nose up at a Squier haven't really given one a serious try in the last ten or fifteen years. Yes, Squiers from the 80's/90's earned a reputation as craptacular guitars- many sucked. Totally different ballgame now.
Play your Squier with pride.
Squier-shaming is a thing of the past. Really. It's pretty much been over for a decade or more.
?it is just a matter of time in these threads, but someone always does it!!!!