Wallace320 said:
A preCBS salmon pink Jazz bass like yours deserves the caveau of FortKnox

That's why a wise player like I think you must be (accustomed to Vintage specs) finds proficient to play Classic Vibe Squiers

They got a "similar" feeling, in a way, but they're no brainer if giggin' around
Yeah: I feel like you can't fool me talkin' about "not protectin'" such lil' treasure
Cheers,
Wallace
PS: MIM standard, if Classic '50s is too costy, sounds anyway better... lotta things to upgrade, but traditional alder body instead of more modern basswood, and just modern specs, which is good.
Lol, not trying to fool anyone, I assure you!
If you put the CV-Jazz up against the real thing, in every aspect the real thing is a MUCH better all around instrument.
I play the 62 as often as I possibly can, and honestly if I felt comfortable leaving it out if its case to sit like the CV, I'd probably ALWAYS reach for the vintage.
However, there is no disappointment, when I'm playing the Classic Vibe, it's an incredible bass on every level I can think of (including fret end's)
The overall fit & finish is excellent.
If I was Fender (Squier) and I wanted to get it even closer to the original 60's basses, I don't feel like there's a whole lot that would need changing.
Minor things like, the horrible modern day tort guard on the Jazz. That thing looks NOTHING like the real deal.
The fret material, can't tell you why, I just don't know enough, but the old bass has no clanky sounds when fretting I've noticed on modern basses. Maybe the metal is softer or something???
I would prefer the original 60's style bridge, and nut.
Of coarse the P'ups.
Last would be the tuners.
But none of these changes would be because they currently lack ANYTHING. More so just to get it closer to the real vintage feel & sound.
Ok that's my thoughts, carry on!!