• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stage Presence is Everything

acting the fool.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Watchootognbout
All I can say is, if it weren't for the Beatles, rock mighta stayed like this for a few more years. My parents love this crap.
Well, the Beatles inspired these guys, or at least created the chance for their shot at 15 minutes of fame, and let’s face it, there’s a few very early Fabs songs that were on this level. Freddie and company appealed to 10/11 year old girls, while The Beatles had a more worldly 13 on up following. For every Freddie, Gerry, and Billy J., you still had a Yardbirds, Who, and Pretty Things to move music along. Not to mention Mick and the boys; can you imagine a father hearing “I’m a king bee, baby, let me come inside your hive” blasting from a daughter’s record player?
 
Well, the Beatles inspired these guys, or at least created the chance for their shot at 15 minutes of fame, and let’s face it, there’s a few very early Fabs songs that were on this level. Freddie and company appealed to 10/11 year old girls, while The Beatles had a more worldly 13 on up following. For every Freddie, Gerry, and Billy J., you still had a Yardbirds, Who, and Pretty Things to move music along. Not to mention Mick and the boys; can you imagine a father hearing “I’m a king bee, baby, let me come inside your hive” blasting from a daughter’s record player?
You know, after I posted this, I thought I should have revised it to "Thank godless the Beatles started smoking pot in 1965." I meant it more about the substance - I agree, early Beatles, conceptually, wasn't all that different from this stuff.

Yeah, the Yardbirds and the Stones weren't twee bubble gum, but conceptually, they were more or less R&B/blues bands at that point, which lyrically, good as it often is, still isn't exactly hefty in the substance part of the lyrics, and it's not going to have a certain level of melodic/harmonic complexity, due to the somewhat limiting expectations of those genres. I think the Beatles just took that into a realm, lyrically, that wouldn't have fit too well in the blues/RB paradigm, and the changes harmonically and melodically in their music at that time, reflected that as well.

I was wondering when someone was gonna call me out on this! ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ctmullins
Holy crap! At least these guys gimmicks are musical. Seriously, these guys can play! I don't recall seeing rock from this era that jammed like this. And that bassist!
What, you’ve never heard Cliff Gallup with Gene Vincent...

Even Cliff’s replacement was no slouch...

Then there’s Eddie, influence on everybody from Zeppelin to the Sex Pistols...

You want moves, and chops?

 
You know, after I posted this, I thought I should have revised it to "Thank godless the Beatles started smoking pot in 1965." I meant it more about the substance - I agree, early Beatles, conceptually, wasn't all that different from this stuff.

Yeah, the Yardbirds and the Stones weren't twee bubble gum, but conceptually, they were more or less R&B/blues bands at that point, which lyrically, good as it often is, still isn't exactly hefty in the substance part of the lyrics, and it's not going to have a certain level of melodic/harmonic complexity, due to the somewhat limiting expectations of those genres. I think the Beatles just took that into a realm, lyrically, that wouldn't have fit too well in the blues/RB paradigm, and the changes harmonically and melodically in their music at that time, reflected that as well.

I was wondering when someone was gonna call me out on this! ;)
The Yardbirds, once Beck was in the band, started inventing the future, and even though it was a number of months later in ‘66, bookended that year with a sound that hadn’t been heard before, and certainly wasn’t same old I-IV-V....

 
  • Like
Reactions: lordradish
What, you’ve never heard Cliff Gallup with Gene Vincent...

Even Cliff’s replacement was no slouch...

Then there’s Eddie, influence on everybody from Zeppelin to the Sex Pistols...

You want moves, and chops?


Def. know Cochran, I cut my teeth on that as a kid when I went through my rockabilly phase, didn't know about most of the others, though. Did know Vincent. Thanks!
I think I just generally don't associate this era of mainstream rock as being more than rudimentary in the chops department. That drummer in the original video is clearly a jazzer, and the other guys ain't slouches, either.
 
Last edited:
Def. know Cochran, I cut my teeth on that as a kid when I went through my rockabilly phase, didn't know about most of the others, though. Did know Vincent. Thanks!
I think I just generally don't associate this era of mainstream rock as being more than rudimentary in the chops department. That drummer in the original video is clearly a jazzer, and the other guys ain't slouches, either.
Eddie could shake the strings quite well, but for some reason chose not to show it too often...


While Brian Setzer adopted Eddie’s guitar, look, and vocals, his guitar playing is all Gallup; with all due respect to Scotty Moore(and it can be traced back to Merle Travis, and to a lesser extent, Chet Atkins), Cliff invented the classic Gretsch Rockabilly style...

...and while not technically Rock’n’Roll, Mr. Polsfuss was more than just a name on a guitar, and could, indeed, rock...

More 50’s chops, courtesy James Burton(with Joe Osborn on bass)...

Now, with this criminally overlooked outfit, the instrumentalists are not the primary dancers, but the singers, what moves!