• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Stigma for not playing Fender

Nah....we have 3 bassist in the church rotation. Not a Fender to be found.....Lakland, Sire, and Ibanez.

What Sire though? The Ps and Vs are going to be close enough that the soundman's probably not going to tell it's not a Fender unless the bandleader calls it out.

I know of the stigma against non-Fenders, but have never encountered it personally. I imagine it's equal parts:
  1. Fender = known quantity a soundman can quickly set up
  2. Fender = quality but unassuming workingman's bass, unlike those highfalutin' coffee-table lawyer basses
  3. Not MIA = Not in mah town! They took muh jawb, they ain't takin' muh church/bar!
For my part, I bring what I own that feels good to play and that I know has an easily mixable sound. I do have a Mexi Jazz (which even then would likely get eschewed in certain crowds), and I did choose my Sire P7 over the Yamaha 735 because of its Fender-y looks, but if anyone asks why I didn't just get a Fender, the answer will be "because Fender doesn't make a 5-string active P/J anywhere but the Custom Shop, and if I'm gonna spend 00 on a bass, it's not going to look like a Fender."

Luckily, as I said, I have little to worry about. My church bandleader plays a Seagull with a Tak as his backup, and the bassist plays a Squier, so the Tecate Taylor acoustic I show up with doesn't get so much as a sideways glance. The guitarist/bandleader for my bar band (where I play bass these days) does personally favor the USA brands, but his primary's a Mexi Charvel, and he's no brand snob; if it feels good and sounds good, rock the house. I showed up to the audition with an Ibby BTB, rocked the first gig with a Yammie TRB and now I'm playing the Sire, and he's had nothing but praise for how any of them looked and sounded.
 
If you don't know what to expect, showing up with a Fender or a Fender-looking instrument is the safe bet. If it's a metal band, a Dingwall is the safe bet.
I've yet to see a Dingwall in Boston at a metal gig. I'm sure there are some Berklee kids using them, but I've never seen one at a metal show. Metal shows for the most oart around here are in an estimation of order of incidence, Fender P or J, Gibson, T-Bird, Ripper, Grabber, or something sufficiently old school Gibson, Newer secondary brands like Schecter/ESP/Ibanez, Old school hotness like Aria/Washburn/Westone coffee table like things and then Pointy stuff like BCR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Miles_ONeal
upload_2020-10-29_9-29-46.jpeg

upload_2020-10-29_9-30-29.jpeg


I luv my Spectors
upload_2020-10-29_9-31-34.png
 
I mostly play in country bands (thats New Mexico for you). I showed up to rehearsal once with an American Special P and they said "At least you have the right bass." I just sat on a 10 song country album with a Reverend WattPlower, and no one would know it wasn't a P bass.

But I get what you're saying. Of course no one questions our amps.


Similar to those that consider the Precision Bass the "one bass to rule them all" (and probably justifiably so), I've noticed there's a lot of emphasis in a lot of places that if you aren't playing a Fender, that you don't have "the sound/authenticity" (sorry Gibson).

Example: worship music. You play a Fender Jazz or a Fender P and those are your choices. You show up to a big church with something that's not a Fender and you'll get some looks.
Seems like this is also the sentiment for studio as well. You're using a Fender P, Fender Jazz, or a Fender active 5.

It feels like there's some stigma about the instrument not being legitimate if it's not a Fender. What are your experiences?

Maybe it's just me?
Discuss?
 
I've not experienced this. But, the Fender P and Fender J are probably the most recorded basses of all time for a reason. On the other hand, if you sound good and are sending a good signal to the board, usually that satisfies any critics pretty quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarMar
Example: worship music. You play a Fender Jazz or a Fender P and those are your choices. You show up to a big church with something that's not a Fender and you'll get some looks.
Good grief. It's worship music. You play 3 songs in some variation of [vi IV I V] and the bass is barely in the mix... nonexistent in the online mix.

Sounds like someone is taking themselves a little too seriously.
 
Last edited:
Similar to those that consider the Precision Bass the "one bass to rule them all" (and probably justifiably so), I've noticed there's a lot of emphasis in a lot of places that if you aren't playing a Fender, that you don't have "the sound/authenticity" (sorry Gibson).

Example: worship music. You play a Fender Jazz or a Fender P and those are your choices. You show up to a big church with something that's not a Fender and you'll get some looks.
Seems like this is also the sentiment for studio as well. You're using a Fender P, Fender Jazz, or a Fender active 5.

It feels like there's some stigma about the instrument not being legitimate if it's not a Fender. What are your experiences?

Maybe it's just me?
Discuss?
That's never happened to me in my 40 years of being a professional freelancer.

(...but then again, I was using Leo's *next* basses...MusicMans.)
 
Last edited:
The Fender culture definitely does not exist in my church. Everyone is fairly young on the teams (18-40ish), and we all run a pedalboard or something like a Line 6 Stomp. I've seen the main bass player use I think 4 different basses now, and only one was an actual Fender P bass. Between all of us on two campuses I've seen Fender, Yamaha, G&L, Ibanez, Sire, Wilkins, and several Fender inspired basses I wasn't able to fully identify at a distance. Then there's me who has used G. Gould, Modulus, Rickenbacker, Yamaha, and an occasional appearance by an old SD Curlee. No one has ever asked me to use something different, to change my tone, or really anything else for that matter. If anyone out in the congregation or whoever watches online can tell a major difference between all of them when the bass isn't usually mixed as well as I'd personally prefer, then I'd actually be shocked or the only question out of my mouth would be, "Oh, you must play the bass too!" I think WE can hear it, but to the average listener I really doubt it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
About 25 years ago. I was in a '60s pop band and owned an American Standard Precision Bass and a cheap but very cool turquoise Hofner copy, a real eye-grabber. The guitar player told me the sound man wanted me to play the Fender, which turned out to be a lie. The guitar player was the only one who wanted me to play the Fender! I kept playing the Hofner copy in that band, regardless.
 
Eleanor Roosevelt said:
What other people think of me is none of my business.
Yeah, I have sometimes encountered a pro-Fender bias, especially among FOH operators, studio engineers and producers—but lately I feel like that’s diminished a lot. There’s less work for everybody in the music business and therefore less money; accordingly, brand diversity among basses is gaining wider acceptance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
A Pbass is a Pbass regardless of what it says on the headstock, and Fender doesn't even make the nicest Pbass on the market. Other people's opinions of things they know nothing about should be none of your concern.
Pbass also stands for pointy bass, which this bass is, and is also a Pbass. I doubt it says Fender on the headstock. But, with some flats, through a B-15 I'd bet it sounds like Motown.
View attachment 4034608

As a matter of fact, that particular Explorer bass more than likely says "Hondo", "Arbor", or "Force 10" on the headstock

....and I agree with you.