• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

String Through?

Nothing really. Some people think a string-through contributes to longer sustain or greater string tension. But beyond making your life more difficult if you like heavy-gauge flats, they don't add anything sonically IMO. It's one of those "what's better: tort or pearloid" questions. It's all a matter of personal taste. I have basses that are stung through the body and the bridge. And after careful listening, I've never been able to discern a significant difference in sound or feel between the two methods.

Your ears or mileage may vary.
 
I always use string through if it's available, always have. I like to think it feels more "solid" somehow, whether I really believe that's scientifically true, wellll.......
 
I have never detected a tonal difference from running the strings through the body on either string-through guitars or basses, which is good, because I find it a PITA. Not so much on basses, but on my Tele with block saddles, it's a MAJOR hassle. Actually, top-loading isn't much easier with those saddles either.
 
On guitars with top loader bridges I've noticed the saddles can wiggle around and rattle against each other, because the shallower break angle of the strings doesn't provide as much downward pressure as a string through, but that has not been a problem on my bass with a top load bridge.
 
String through body puts pressure on the saddles downwards generally which is a good thing. Instead of coming from behind the saddle, the string comes up from under the saddle.

Other than that, it's very handy for Fender type basses where the E or B string tuner is close to the nut. Depending on the string, going through body can prevent the outer wraps from going around the tuner post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petey293