• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Take a look at McCartney's bass action.

Hey people
I was browsing wikipedia as usual and I decided to see a big sized pic of Paul. Take a look at the high action!!! I know that he is not a fast player, that the Hofner is not a very well constructed bass, and that it is short scale. Still, it looks painful to play.
Paul_McCartney_live_in_Dublin.jpg
 
IMHO, Hofner requires an action not exactly low.
And the bowed neck is easy to restraighten, consider some years ago Macca brought his bass to Mandolin Brothers, a NY luthier, for a total revamping.
Anyway, this is the action on mine (even if i'm going to my luthier today):

2i9p4er.jpg
 
IMHO, Hofner requires an action not exactly low.
And the bowed neck is easy to restraighten, consider some years ago Macca brought his bass to Mandolin Brothers, a NY luthier, for a total revamping.
Anyway, this is the action on mine (even if i'm going to my luthier today):

2i9p4er.jpg

That looks very high to me, but if it works for you, it is all good.
I just find it interesting to see the set ups of some big names. People who can get pretty much any bass they want, with a perfect set up, confortable, low action, etc, often prefer "less desirable" instruments and set ups, like Paul and his old Hofner.
 
In the old days when the Beatles were just coming forward, lots of good guitars weren't readily available in England and the musicians had to make do with what there was.

I have always suspected that that's how Paul wound up getting a cheap Hofner bass to learn on and just wound up sticking with it.

I picked up a Hofner bass the other day and it felt like a "toy" in my hands . . . short scale for sure, and high action. But for some reason the narrow neck and shorter scale made the action feel "soft" and comfortable even though it was way-y higher than I'd ever entertain on my Jazz basses.

Again, I believe it's just what Paul got used to and he stuck with it.

:cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMacBass65
In the old days when the Beatles were just coming forward, lots of good guitars weren't readily available in England and the musicians had to make do with what there was.

I have always suspected that that's how Paul wound up getting a cheap Hofner bass to learn on and just wound up sticking with it.

As I recall, much of Paul's choice on picking the Hofner had to do with finding a bass that was light and comfortable to wear for prolonged periods on stage.
 
As I recall, much of Paul's choice on picking the Hofner had to do with finding a bass that was light and comfortable to wear for prolonged periods on stage.

+1 Paul, being a lefty, was intrigued that the Hofner was symmetrcal and the price was affordable for him as well. I recall him saying that the Hofner cost him about 30 pounds and a Fender was about 100 pounds at the time and he didn't have the money for a Fender.
 
Yeah I had already heard the story about the cheap and symmetrical instrument. I think it is cool to see that a lot of pros don't use the one that is expected to be the most desirable set up. I have tired to use higher action but I just can't. I can't play fast stuff and my arm hurts. Good if it works for you, because it can deliver a different and cleaner tone.