I've never had trouble with the Martins sounding harsh or cold (quite the opposite--their known for rich clear bass that Taylors lack)
Fixed.
I'd have to guess that a heavier gauge string would be less tinny.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've never had trouble with the Martins sounding harsh or cold (quite the opposite--their known for rich clear bass that Taylors lack)
There are no tubes in an Avalon U5.
Back on-topic: My experience with Taylor is lmited to one acoustic owned by one of the guitar players in a band I was in up until 2009. He owned the Taylor, and a Martin. I don't know the models, but he quantified them by saying that they were both about $1,000. At the $1,000 pricepoint (assuming he was accurate), the Taylor sounded and played infinitely better than the Martin. Based on this experience I had always assumed that Taylors were incredible. I'll be purchasing a new acoustic this year for a new project, and I'll have to give Taylor a more objective look after hearing the comments in this thread.
FWIW, I think that it is bad form to intentionally misquote someone.Fixed.
I've had it done to me and I didn't think it was particularly funny.fwiw I fixed his quote and wrote 'fixed'. a common archetype of humor on the interwebs.