Way to take a great brand and turn it into a waste of money.
Lexicon owned by Digitech. Digitech pedals improving. Not the other way round.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Way to take a great brand and turn it into a waste of money.
Other way around pal..Oh come on now I'm sure TC won't hurt Beringer that much.
It was a joke. Speaking of which, hopefully my pre-Behringer TC tuner just went up in valueOther way around pal..
I don't know man...a guy I know who rents and runs sound gear carries 3 of those X32 digital boards Behringer makes because they keep breaking down on him on a regular basis. He's had to change out the board on a show he ran for us, too. I asked him why he didn't just buy one Yamaha LS-9. He says, "3 Behringer boards are still cheaper than one LS-9." OK, but that's a lot of money on repair costs once they're out of warranty. My buddy with the LS-9 has two, got them when they first came out, and he hasn't resorted to the backup even once yet.Behringer is stepping up their game. They have been. They just have that allure of past practices and stuff allegedly blowing up at random. Something I have never seen or experienced. I've seen more 'name' brand gear bite the dust. Can they improve on some things? Sure! Just like any other company. Stop being gear snobs. This may be a good thing.
It's like all of the wattage delusional are getting together.
This should really improve things....![]()
Define fail? I tried one of their kickback clones years ago and it didn't come close to making good tone or the big power numbers emblazoned on the front (and yes I get that those are peak but really? TE never did that and now 'Trace' watts are almost a separate power benchmark). That to me is an epic FAIL.Agreed. I've never had a Behringer piece fail...
I think it's probably because most people don't like being lied to in order to get them to part with their money. Call me crazy...I think this is too bad, but then I've never understood TB's hate-on for TC. I get that people here feel mislead by the way they name their amps (even though they never really hid the actual power output) and I agree the naming should have been altogether different if not reflecting the actual power output... but all that aside, their pedals rock (I own one and used to own another), the toneprints are pretty cool, and Mike Watt sounds incredible through his TC amp.
I don't know man...a guy I know who rents and runs sound gear carries 3 of those X32 digital boards Behringer makes because they keep breaking down on him on a regular basis. He's had to change out the board on a show he ran for us, too. I asked him why he didn't just buy one Yamaha LS-9. He says, "3 Behringer boards are still cheaper than one LS-9." OK, but that's a lot of money on repair costs once they're out of warranty. My buddy with the LS-9 has two, got them when they first came out, and he hasn't resorted to the backup even once yet.
I think it's probably because most people don't like being lied to in order to get them to part with their money. Call me crazy...
TC did hide the actual power output. It was not until AFTER they were called on it they offered real information.
You should beYamaha TF would be perfect for this guy.
TF Series | Mixers | Products |
Yamaha
(No, I'm not affiliated with Yamaha)