It occupies the same range as a guitar, but has a totally different sound, due to the longer scale length. Listen to some of Stanley Clarke's piccolo work to hear what I am talking about.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
embellisher said:It occupies the same range as a guitar, but has a totally different sound, due to the longer scale length. Listen to some of Stanley Clarke's piccolo work to hear what I am talking about.
DW said:I know it sounds different. But if none of the strings are in the bass range, it's simply not a bass at all - piccolo or otherwise. And it's not a baritone either. It's just a longer scale guitar.
As for the original subject of this thread, well, there's nothing new about 5 or 6 string basses tuned like that, but "tenor bass" is a new term and it's definitely an oxymoron.
DW said:Hey, whatever anyone wants to play, that's fine with me. But "tenor bass" and "piccolo bass" are oxymorons.
Blackbird said:Piccolos predate tenors by a couple of decades at least...
I see..........but what about a Bass saxophone, baritone saxophone, tenor saxophone and soprano saxophone?Nick Gann said:Tenor bass and piccolo bass are not oxymorons unless you refuse to use the term in the context in which they exist, which, quite frankly, is closed minded and ignorant.
Limo said:I see..........but what about a Bass saxophone, baritone saxophone, tenor saxophone and soprano saxophone?
Shouldn't we have Bass guitar, baritone guitar, tenor guitar and soprano guitar?
Bass is tonal range like baritone, tenor and soprano. A piccolo is simply Italian for small...... I think (might be wrong)
Well "The Bass" is a new term created by people but a "Bass guitar" is a guitar with the bass frequency. What about baritone guitar?? it's tuned in B like a 7 string guitar but it's considered a baritone guitar not "The Baritone"Nick Gann said:Bass: Frequency range
The Bass: A musical instrument
A sax is an instrument that can be used and configured in different frequency ranges. A bass is an instrument that can be used and configured in different frequency ranges.
Again, it is all about context. My point still stands.
john turner said:heh, that'd be a nice trick since he doesn't own any 9's yet![]()
he's a crazy 88
![]()
HeheNick Gann said:What about the term "Electric Bass". It is an instrument, not an electrified frequency range![]()
But I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just trying to get a solution because I think it should be clear what to call things. That is why I mentioned AJ because ,I guess, he though it wouldn't be appropriate to call it a "Bass guitar" so he called it the "Contrabass guitar"Nick Gann said:But you're missing my point, its the "Electric Bass" not the "Electric Low Frequency Range"
Let's agree to disagree, that will be the only solutionWhile the bass is a type of guitar, I think of it as another instrument. It is like saying the trumpet, tuba, and euphoniom are the same thing. As a tuba player, I cannot allow that
![]()
So in this context the Tenor bass really is an oxymoron isn't it?Nick Gann said:I see your point. In my opinion though, the term "Electric Bass" has become a title, not a description. Thats just my view. I see what you are saying, and I agree with you. In the context in which you are talking about.
Again, its all about context
I really don't understand the "contrabass guitar" designation Anthony Jackson gave the instrument. I was first under the impression that a contrabass guitar was a 6 string bass tuned EADGBE, not BEADGC. I think he just wanted to be different, so he made up a term to separate himself from the rest. But that's another discussion for another time![]()
Allright, I still think it should be more specific what to call things.Nick Gann said:In that context, yes. In the context I was refering to, no.![]()