• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

That's it...I'm done with flying

I fly about 1/2 dozen times a year. Rarely is it that I wait in security more than 20-25 minutes and I fly out of SeaTac.

Same here. The lines look long at times, but they move fast.

-Mike

Yea, SeaTac is a breeze. Getting there one hour before the scheduled flight has always left plenty of time to get thru security and to the gate. Also, they never take my weed at SeaTac :thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Immigrant
For those who fly regularly in the USA for work or pleasure why not apply for the TSA pre-check?

It's on my list, but I pretty consistently use one airline. I have enough goodwill earned that in many airports I am able to use the express lanes. This allows me to bypass most of the wait, but I undergo the same inspection as the other passengers.

This week I used a different airline from usual as they service that traffic lane better. It was a reminder to submit the application.
 
For those who fly regularly in the USA for work or pleasure why not apply for the TSA pre-check?
The wife and I do because we fly a lot...she more than I. TSA wants frequent flyers to apply for this program but few do.

The country needs to dismantle all the PC & just properly & effectively screen for type. Many countries do...too much navel gazing here.
 
I'm well aware of the statistics, and am a big fan of air travel. However, the one reason I can see to change air travel policies is because it is actually possible. These are national and international agencies that can sooner turn on a dime than the cat herding process that would result from a decree to change parameter x or y in automobile travel.
 
...flying cars are way overdue.
Do you mean like this?
Might work if they are designed to be completely pilot-less. If it is left to the general public to fly them and make good aeronautical inflight judgement decisions, then many will die. Just sayin.

tfxv03farmland-WM_zps16787142.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Immigrant
Soooooooooo I can drive to California in a few days from the Mid-Atlantic where I live. And that's driving pretty steady without many breaks.

Or, I can stand in line for an hour, sit in a chair and read a magazine for a little while, board the plane and take a nap and BOOM I'm in Hippietopia!

I'll take plan B thank you.

Meanwhile if there's an actual BOOM it will all be over in seconds anyway. Me and Gawd are homeboys so I'm ready for that too. ;)
 
As long as whoever makes a flying car/roadable aircraft has an easy to use autopilot, sure.
It already exists, more or less. Look at drones. My buddy has one that you can command to go to a certain GPS location, at a certain altitude, stay there awhile then return, at the press of a button. It's not much of a stretch to see that applied to people movers. We will of course need a very robust, automated air traffic control system. But it'll happen. Commercial flights are almost entirely automated now.
 
I used to love flying, but I gave up on it. The terrorists win.
If I can drive there, I'm driving. I'll drive straight through or stay in a motel if it's more than about 14 hours.
That's your prerogative, but be aware that you are about 20 times more likely to die in your car than in a plane. 20 times. That's a fact, jack. You'd have to fly every single day for nineteen thousand years to die in a plane crash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GregC and ubnomnar